Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript — qualitative coding and the data-to-theory ladder, process analysis, or quantitative estimation and robustness. Makes the evidence-to-theory link transparent; it does not design the study (see orgstud-methods).
Use when choosing and justifying the research design for an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript — qualitative/ethnographic, process, historical, or quantitative — and setting the rigor bar OS reviewers expect. Designs the study; it does not run the analysis (see orgstud-data-analysis).
Use when calibrating expectations for the Organization Studies (OS) review cycle — desk-screen odds, the developmental double-anonymized process, decision types, and how to read what reviewers and the handling editor are signalling. Sets expectations and reading strategy; it does not draft the response (see orgstud-rebuttal).
Use when choosing or sharpening the phenomenon and research question for an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript — testing whether it is theoretically generative for OS's European organization-theory audience. Diagnoses fit and scope; it does not build the theory or run analysis.
Use when running and reporting the computational study for an Operations Research (OR) manuscript — benchmark instances, baselines, reproducible experiments, statistical care for stochastic output, and the ORJournal code-and-data reproducibility workflow. Executes and reports the numerical evidence; it does not prove the results (ors-methods) or lay out the exhibits (ors-tables-figures).
Use when placing an Operations Research (OR) manuscript against the OR/MS literature — separating your model, results, and algorithmic guarantees from the closest prior work so the novelty is unambiguous. Positions the contribution; it does not formulate the model (ors-theory-development) or write the contribution statement (ors-contribution-framing).
Use when positioning an OSDI submission against prior systems literature — covering the OSDI/SOSP/NSDI/FAST/EuroSys/ATC lanes, verifying venues through USENIX's free open-access proceedings and dblp, and citing your own precursors without breaking the renamed-system anonymity rule.
Use when reasoning about how an OSDI paper is reviewed and decided — the double-blind HotCRP PC pipeline with no author-response period, the two tracks, conditional acceptance with heavyweight shepherding, co-chair recusal, notification timing, and the Jay Lepreau Best Paper lineage.
Use when deciding whether a systems project fits OSDI, choosing between its Research and Operational Systems tracks, or routing the work to SOSP, NSDI, FAST, EuroSys, or the post-USENIX ATC instead — applying the built-and-measured test before a December deadline is spent on a misfit.
Use when targeting Pacific Graphics (Pacific Graphics) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for computer graphics.