Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
Use when responding to a Mind decision — a revise-and-resubmit, a reject-with-encouragement, or referee reports to address before resubmitting. The response must answer expert philosophical objections without weakening the thesis, while keeping the manuscript prepared for triple-anonymous review. Structures the revision and the response letter; it does not fabricate new arguments.
Use when drafting or polishing the prose of a Mind article so the argument is maximally clear to a broad philosophical readership within the ~8,000-word limit. Mind asks that even technical material be accompanied by informal exposition. Tightens sentences and clarity; it does not generate the argument (see mind-thesis-and-argument).
Use after a MIS Quarterly revision decision to plan the revision and draft the point-by-point response — prioritizing the Senior Editor's letter, addressing tradition-specific rigor concerns (identification, validity/CMB, artifact evaluation, trustworthiness), updating the transparency materials, and keeping the revised manuscript within its page limit. Drafts the response after the manuscript is actually revised; interpret the decision first with misq-review-process.
Use when drafting or revising a MobiCom paper for house style — putting the wireless/mobile mechanism and its operating regime on the first page, pairing every claim with over-the-air measurement, replacing superlatives with percentiles and intervals, and fitting the argument into the double-column 12-page body.
Use when building the analytical model or operational mechanism at the core of a Manufacturing & Service Operations Management (M&SOM) manuscript — formulating the decision, objective, and uncertainty; deriving structural results; or specifying the operational mechanism behind an empirical hypothesis. Adapts theory work to M&SOM's dominant analytical/stochastic-modeling tradition.
Use when targeting 《南开经济研究》(Nankai Economic Studies — 南开大学经济学院主办的综合性经济学双月刊, 1985 年创刊, CSSCI/北大核心, 不收版面费/审稿费) or deciding whether a Chinese econ manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, abstract/keyword house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when targeting Nature Climate Change or deciding whether a climate science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use to write the discussion section for 《南开管理评论》 (Nankai Business Review) so it loops back to the introduction's gap and advances a management theory — extension, boundary condition, or integration — rather than restating results. Use when the discussion only summarizes findings, or when the theoretical-contribution paragraph repeats the hypotheses without saying what changed in the theory.
Use to judge whether a manuscript fits 《南开管理评论》 (Nankai Business Review) before investing in revision, and to re-route off-fit papers — math models to 管理科学学报, macro policy-evaluation to 管理世界 / 中国工业经济, capital-market governance to 会计研究 / 金融研究. Use when the topic, method, or framing might be a mismatch for a theory-building management journal.
Use when writing an NDSS rebuttal and working the interactive discussion phase — triaging Round-2 reviews under a short window, answering adaptive-attack and ethics objections with pointable evidence, and negotiating toward Accept or a well-scoped Minor/Major Revision.