Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
Use when writing or repairing the introduction and related-work framing for a Journal of Political Economy (JPE) manuscript — situating the contribution in the economics literature with author-date citations. Frames positioning and the intro arc; it does not run the empirics or build the model.
Use when a Journal of Political Economy (JPE) decision letter (R&R or reject-with-encouragement) has arrived and you need to draft the response-to-referees letter and revision plan. Structures the response and the diff; it does not redo the analysis (route back to jpe-identification / jpe-theory-model / jpe-robustness first).
Use when responding to peer-review / R&R comments on a 《数量经济技术经济研究》 (JQTE) manuscript — structuring a point-by-point response letter that addresses the journal's characteristic concerns (method transparency, measurement / parameter sensitivity, out-of-sample evaluation, CGE/IO reproducibility, data caliber) and reframing weak-causal pushback toward the paper's real measurement contribution. Use only after the manuscript itself is revised.
Use to design and report robustness for a 《数量经济技术经济研究》 (JQTE) manuscript where the contribution is measurement, a model, or a forecast — focusing on sensitivity to method choice, parameter / specification, data caliber, and sample window, rather than the placebo / parallel-trends battery of a causal paper. Use after the main estimates exist.
Use when writing the policy-implication section of a 《世界经济》 (The Journal of World Economy) manuscript — pitching at the opening-up policy level (trade, exchange rate, capital account, industrial opening) rather than as a domestic operational to-do list. Use after results, channels, and heterogeneity are settled.
Use when responding to a Language (LSA) decision — a revise-and-resubmit response letter, or an author Rejoinder in the Perspectives target-article-and-commentaries format. Turns reviewer objections into a point-by-point revision plan that engages rival frameworks and firms up evidence. Structures the response; it does not fabricate new results.
Use when targeting 《管理评论》(Management Review — 中国科学院大学主办的管理学术月刊, 全程匿名审稿) or deciding whether a Chinese management manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, abstract/keyword/citation house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when preparing Wiley data availability statements and reproducibility notes for a Mathematical Finance manuscript — covers the no-data case typical of this theory venue, archives for illustrative numerical code, per-exhibit provenance, and what a proofs journal does and does not require of authors.
Use when writing the explicit contribution statement for a Management Science (INFORMS) manuscript — turning an analytical result or empirical finding into a decision-relevant insight that travels across departments, and showing why it belongs in Management Science rather than a sister INFORMS journal. It frames the "so what"; it does not run the analysis (mgsci-data-analysis) or position the literature (mgsci-literature-positioning).
Use when sharpening the concepts, distinctions, and method of a Mind article — defining key terms precisely, drawing distinctions, deploying thought experiments, and choosing the right philosophical method. Analytic philosophy lives or dies on conceptual precision and parsimony. Tightens the conceptual machinery; it does not settle the substantive question for you.