Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
Use when applying Review of Economic Dynamics (RED) house style — the stand-alone abstract not exceeding 250 words, author-year (Harvard-style) references, 1 to 6 keywords, LaTeX via Elsevier's elsarticle class under "your paper your way", and the generative-AI declaration. Drafting conventions for a quantitative dynamic paper; it does not invent results.
Use when targeting 《改革》(Reform — 重庆社会科学院主管主办的改革政策类 CSSCI 月刊, 1988 年创刊, 不收版面费) or deciding whether a Chinese social-science/econ/management manuscript fits this journal. Applies the journal's fit, framing, GB/T 7714 citation house-style, official-submission-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when targeting Representations or deciding whether a new-historicist or interdisciplinary cultural-analysis manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's new-historicism fit, the archive-driven argument bar, material-culture and contextual expectations, house style and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when targeting 《研究与发展管理》(R&D Management — 复旦大学主办的研发/创新管理双月刊, 三审三校) or deciding whether a Chinese R&D/innovation-management manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, abstract/footnote house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when the one-sentence "so what" is the bottleneck for a Research Policy (RP) manuscript — converting solid results into an explicit advance for innovation theory/evidence that usually carries a policy or managerial implication. Frames the claim; it does not build the mechanism (respol-theory-development) or polish prose (respol-writing-style).
Use when staking the contribution against the innovation-studies literature for a Research Policy (RP) manuscript — anchoring in the RP/SPRU canon and showing a genuine gap rather than an incremental replication. Positions the paper; it does not build the mechanism (respol-theory-development) or write the closing claim (respol-contribution-framing).
Use when drafting the response to a Research Policy (RP) decision letter — converting double-blind referee and handling-editor comments into a point-by-point response and a revision plan that protects the innovation-studies contribution. Builds the response strategy; it is the terminal skill in the pack.
Use when prose and structure are the bottleneck for a Research Policy (RP) manuscript — making an interdisciplinary innovation-studies argument land for economists, management scholars, and policymakers at once. Polishes the writing; it does not change the contribution (respol-contribution-framing) or run the submission preflight (respol-submission).
Use when the marginal contribution of a The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat) manuscript against the closest prior work is fuzzy, generic, or oversold. Stakes the contribution precisely; it does not run analysis or write the full literature review.
Use when a The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat) decision letter (R&R or reject-and-resubmit) has arrived and the manuscript needs a response-to-referees letter and a revision plan. Drafts the response strategy; it does not run new analysis (route that to the analysis skills).