Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
Use when drafting MLSys author responses on OpenReview under the venue's compressed rebuttal window, prioritizing systems-reviewer objections about workload representativeness, baseline tuning, and missing measurements, deciding whether to run new experiments in days, and keeping replies anonymous and decision-focused.
Use when revising an MLSys paper's prose and structure, building the measured-bottleneck opening, naming the mechanism instead of listing optimizations, writing evaluation sections as answers to research questions, quantifying every performance claim with workload context, and fitting the argument into the venue's 10-page two-column body.
Use when writing a MobiCom rebuttal after round-two reviews or executing a one-shot revision — triaging reviewer points by severity, fitting a factual, concession-honest rebuttal into its length limit, and turning a required-changes list into a change-highlighted revision with a change summary that the same reviewers can verify.
Use when targeting 《现代经济探讨》(Modern Economic Research — 江苏省社会科学院主管主办的综合性经济理论月刊, 1982 年创刊, 匿名审稿、不收版面费) or deciding whether a Chinese econ/management manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, fee-free/anonymous-review policy, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when targeting 《当代经济科学》(Modern Economic Science — 教育部主管、西安交通大学主办的综合性经济学双月刊, 1979 年创刊, 双向匿名审稿、不收版面费) or deciding whether a Chinese econ/finance manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, anonymous-review/fee-free policy, abstract/keyword house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when targeting Modern Language Quarterly (MLQ) or deciding whether a literary-history manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's literary-history fit, the historically grounded argument bar, periodization and change-over-time expectations, house style and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use to lock the single-mechanism arc before drafting — converts a set of correct experiments into one Molecular Cell story that runs molecular question → the mechanism → physiological consequence, not a catalog of techniques.
Use to produce the three signature Cell Press front-matter artifacts for Molecular Cell — Highlights (3–4 bullets, each ≤85 characters), the eTOC/In Brief blurb (~50 words, third-person), and the Graphical Abstract (single-panel visual summary of the mechanism). Late-stage polish.
Use after Molecular Cell reviews arrive to triage the decision, prioritize the (often mechanism-completing) new experiments by impact × feasibility, and draft a point-by-point response that is respectful, evidence-led, and closes the mechanistic gaps reviewers demand. Do not run before the experiments and revision are actually done.
Use to write Molecular Cell's Summary — a single unstructured paragraph (~150 words; re-check on the official site) that conveys the molecular question, the mechanism, and its physiological consequence, named and quantified for a molecular-biology readership. Late-stage polish.