Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
Use when targeting Eurographics Annual Conference (Eurographics) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for computer graphics.
Use when targeting European Conference on Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (ECML PKDD) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for AI/data mining.
Use when writing a EuroSys rebuttal or managing a one-shot revision — reading reviews against the three possible outcomes (accept, revise, reject), answering systems reviewers' measurement and design objections, and turning a revision offer's condition list into a resubmission plan for the next EuroSys deadline.
Use when hardening the reproducibility story of a EuroSys paper — recording hardware and software provenance for every number, taming performance variance with repeated runs and dispersion reporting, versioning workloads and traces, and writing an availability statement that survives both double-blind review and the sysartifacts AEC.
Use when drafting or revising EuroSys prose — building the problem-to-mechanism arc systems reviewers expect, budgeting the 12 technical pages across design and evaluation, writing figure-first evaluation sections, keeping claims measurement-scoped, and maintaining double-blind voice in the acmart sigplan format.
Use when positioning a European Sociological Review (ESR) manuscript against the literature so it reads as a contribution to a comparative, theory-driven quantitative debate rather than a national note. Stakes the contribution in a European sociological debate and names the closest prior estimates; it does not write the literature review.
Use when writing the response to a European Sociological Review (ESR) revise-and-resubmit. ESR R&Rs typically demand substantial revision and reviewers focus on comparative design, measurement equivalence, and modeling, so the response must convert each reviewer while keeping the editor confident. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
Use when preparing the Data Availability Statement and the replication package for a European Sociological Review (ESR) manuscript. ESR requires a Data Availability Statement for every manuscript and (for submissions from 1 January 2025) a replication package for statistical/computational work upon conditional acceptance; qualitative work is exempt. Prepares documentation; it does not over-state or under-state the policy.
Use when drafting or polishing a European Sociological Review (ESR) manuscript so it reads for a comparative quantitative audience, follows OUP/ESR conventions, and fits the limits (Articles around 8,000 words including endnotes and references; abstract at most 200 words). Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.