Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
Use when drafting or strengthening the policy-implications section of an Economic-Research manuscript. Frames implications at the significance / institutional level rather than the actionable / ministry level used by Management-World.
Use when responding to reviewer and editorial-board reports for an 《经济研究》 (Economic Research Journal) R&R — sequencing manuscript revision before letter writing, drafting point-by-point replies in the accept / partial-accept / decline modes, prioritizing 编委 theory-positioning comments, and deciding whether new results go in the body or an appendix. 使用时机：收到《经济研究》外审或编委意见、准备修订正文并撰写逐条回复信、或多轮修改中回复与正文出现不一致时。
Use when self-auditing a 《经济研究》 manuscript before submission against the high-frequency, structural reviewer criticisms recurrent at this journal.
Use when polishing the language and rhetoric of an 《经济研究》 manuscript — eliminating empty-significance phrases, fixing vague policy talk, replacing method-flexing with mechanism, and aligning tense / person / hedging with CSSCI house style. 本技能服务于《经济研究》(Economic Research Journal, ERJ)。
Use when writing the theoretical analysis and hypothesis-development section of an Economic-Research manuscript — deriving testable, directional, falsifiable hypotheses that map one-to-one onto the empirical design.
Use when an Economic-Research manuscript is at the topic-selection stage and the theoretical grounding, marginal-contribution sentence, or venue match are unsettled. Produces the contribution-sentence template and the theoretical-grounding checklist.
Use when writing the cover letter and editor-facing metadata for an Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) submission. ES&T editors desk-screen heavily, so the cover letter must make the environmental significance and fit obvious, name the article type, and supply suggested reviewers. It drafts the letter and metadata; it does not contact editors.
Use when writing the response to an Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) revision decision. ES&T decisions are editor-led on the back of typically three expert reviews, so the response must convert each reviewer with evidence and QA/QC while keeping the editor confident. It structures the response letter and revision; it does not fabricate new results.
Use when deciding whether a problem fits Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) and which article type to target. ES&T rewards demonstrated environmental significance and transformational, direction-setting work over incremental lab results, so this skill pressure-tests the "so what for the environment?" question before you invest. It frames the contribution; it does not run experiments.
Use when drafting or polishing the prose of an Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) manuscript so it reads for a multidisciplinary audience in ACS style and fits the article-type word limit. ES&T values clear environmental significance stated early, ACS citation style, and tight prose. It guides writing and structure; it does not invent content.