post-review

Post Review

Post a previously written review file to GitHub as a proper PR review with inline comments. Supports both /pr-review and /code-review output formats.

Arguments

/post-review <target> [additional instructions]

• <target> — required, one of:
  • A PR number (e.g., 92, #92) — finds the most recent review file for that PR
  • A file path to a review file (e.g., .ai/pr-92/review-pr92-980cb92.md)
• Everything after the target is treated as additional instructions — e.g., "only post the must-fix items", "skip the nits", "post as COMMENT instead of REQUEST_CHANGES", "don't include the commit message findings"

Instructions

1. Parse Arguments

Extract the target from $ARGUMENTS:

• If it looks like a number (with optional # prefix): treat as PR number
• If it contains / or ends in .md: treat as a file path
• Everything after the target (that isn't the target itself) is the additional instructions string — preserve it for step 5

2. Find the Review File

If target is a PR number:

• Search for review files in this order:
  1. .ai/pr-<number>/pr-review-*.md (pr-review format with frontmatter)
  2. .ai/pr-<number>/review-pr<number>-*.md (code-review format)
  3. .ai/issue-*-*/pr-review-*.md matching the PR number in frontmatter
  4. .ai/issue-*-*/review-pr<number>-*.md
• If multiple files match, use the most recently modified one
• If no file is found, tell the user and stop

If target is a file path:

• Read the file directly
• If it doesn't exist, tell the user and stop

3. Detect Review Format and Parse

The skill handles two review file formats:

Format A: /pr-review output (has YAML frontmatter)

---
pr: <number>
event: <APPROVE|COMMENT|REQUEST_CHANGES>
---

<summary text>

**Must Fix**
- ...

**Should Fix**
- ...

**Nit**
- ...

## Inline Comments

### `<file>:<line>`
<comment body>

Parse:

• pr and event from frontmatter
• Review body = everything between the frontmatter closing --- and the ## Inline Comments heading (or end of file if no inline comments section)
• Inline comments = each ### \:`block under## Inline Comments`

Format B: /code-review output (no frontmatter)

# Code Review: PR #<number> - <title>

## Summary
- PR: #<number> - <title>
...

## Checklist Results

### Passed
- ...

### Must Fix
- [ ] **<title>** - `<file>:<line>` - <description>

### Should Fix
- [ ] **<title>** - `<file>:<line>` - <description>

### Nits
- ...

## Recommendations
1. ...

Parse:

• PR number from the # Code Review: PR #<number> heading or - PR: #<number> in Summary
• Event: determine from findings:
  • REQUEST_CHANGES if any "Must Fix" items exist
  • COMMENT if "Should Fix" items exist but no "Must Fix"
  • APPROVE if only "Passed" and optionally "Nit" items
• Review body: compose from the file content (see step 5)
• Inline comments: extract from Must Fix / Should Fix / Nit items that reference file:line

4. Get PR Diff for Line Mapping

Fetch the PR diff to map file:line references to actual diff positions:

gh pr diff <number>

Also fetch the PR metadata:

gh pr view <number> --json headRefOid,number,baseRefName --jq '{headRefOid: .headRefOid, number: .number, baseRefName: .baseRefName}'

For each inline comment, verify the referenced line is visible in the diff. If a line is not in the diff, move that finding into the review body summary instead.

5. Apply Additional Instructions

If the user provided additional instructions, apply them now. Common patterns:

• "only must-fix" / "only the must fix items" — drop Should Fix, Nit sections and their inline comments
• "skip nits" / "no nits" — remove Nit section and nit-related inline comments
• "skip commit message" / "no commit findings" — remove commit-message-related findings
• "post as COMMENT" — override the event to COMMENT regardless of findings
• "post as APPROVE" — override event to APPROVE
• "only inline comments" — minimize the body, post only inline comments
• "only items 1 and 3" — post only the specified numbered findings
• Any other filtering or modification the user describes

Use judgement to interpret the instructions. The goal is to give the user control over exactly what gets posted.

6. Compose the GitHub Review

Review body (the body parameter):

For Format A (pr-review): use the parsed review body text directly (between frontmatter and inline comments), after applying any filtering from step 5.

For Format B (code-review): compose a concise review body:

• Opening: a 1-3 sentence summary/verdict (derive from the review's overall assessment or recommendations)
• Include severity sections (Must Fix, Should Fix, Nit) that survived filtering, reformatted as clean bullet lists without checkboxes
• Keep it concise — this is a public GitHub review comment, not the full local review file
• Do NOT include the "Passed", "Summary", "Recommendations", or "Ready for PR?" sections

For both formats: end the body with a blank line, then the attribution line:

🤖 Review generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/claude-code)

Inline comments (the comments array):

For each inline comment that maps to a valid diff line:

• path: the file path (relative to repo root)
• line: the line number in the new version of the file
• body: the comment text

Important: Only include inline comments for lines that appear in the diff. The GitHub API will reject comments on lines not visible in the diff.

7. Preview Before Posting

Before posting, show the user a preview:

**PR #<number> — Review Preview**

Event: <APPROVE|COMMENT|REQUEST_CHANGES>

Body:
<first 5 lines of body>...

Inline comments: <count>
<list each as "- `file:line` — first 50 chars of comment...">

Then ask: "Post this review?"

Wait for the user's confirmation before proceeding. If they say no or want changes, adjust accordingly.

8. Post the Review

Determine repo owner and name:

gh repo view --json owner,name --jq '"\(.owner.login) \(.name)"'

Post using mcp__github__create_pull_request_review with:

• owner: repo owner
• repo: repo name
• pull_number: PR number
• body: composed review body
• event: determined event type
• commit_id: the head SHA of the PR
• comments: array of inline comments (may be empty)

9. Report Result

After posting:

• Confirm the review was posted
• Show the PR URL: https://github.com/<owner>/<repo>/pull/<number>
• If any inline comments were skipped (not in diff), mention which ones