whart-test
WHartTest测试管理平台工具集。用于管理项目、模块、测试用例的增删改查,以及测试截图上传。当用户需要操作测试用例、查询项目信息或上传截图时使用。
Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
WHartTest测试管理平台工具集。用于管理项目、模块、测试用例的增删改查,以及测试截图上传。当用户需要操作测试用例、查询项目信息或上传截图时使用。
Live Debugger - inspect runtime argument/variable values in production by placing log probes on methods. Use when asked what values a function receives, what parameters look like at runtime, or to capture live data from running services without redeploying.
Load when investigating a specific flaky test. Gets history, failure pattern, and category, then recommends fix, quarantine, or escalate.
Use this when adding Nix-based local runs for an existing Playwright e2e suite. Provides a self-contained `tests/shell.nix` that uses `nixpkgs-latest` for `playwright-driver.browsers`, plus a justfile entry — works on NixOS where `npx playwright install --with-deps` cannot.
Run /be's review gauntlet SERIALLY — /lens-debate (lowy ⇄ hickey), then /codex-debate, then /simplify, then code-police, each editing and committing on the live branch in turn. Use from /be §4, or when the user asks to "run the review gauntlet". Requires Claude Code's Skill tool.
Run an automated codex⇄Claude debate to consensus — no round cap, no deadlock exit. Two explicit subcommands. `review` (also the bare/back-compat default) — codex (reviewer) critiques the current diff and a Claude subagent (author) fixes/disputes, looping until they agree. `answer` — Claude and codex each answer a freeform prompt in parallel, then cross-check until they agree, and a unified answer is returned. Use when the user types `/codex-debate`, asks to "have codex review this", "run the codex debate", "review this PR with codex", "argue this with codex until you agree", or passes a question to "have Claude and codex debate/answer until they agree".
Run a structural-review debate between two lenses — lowy (volatility-based decomposition) and hickey (structural simplicity) — on the current diff. Each reviews independently, then they cross-examine every finding until they agree per-finding, and the agreed fixes are applied. Use when the user types `/lens-debate`, or asks to "have lowy and hickey review this", "run the lens debate", "debate this diff structurally", or "argue the structure of this PR until the lenses agree".
Adversarial "perfection" review — hold a change to an *ideal* bar, not just a correct one, assuming eternal time, unlimited energy, and no ship pressure. Use when the user asks to review "for perfection", to make a defect "impossible to express", or to hunt where a defect "relocates" across review rounds. Grounds every claim in the diff, fans out adversarial verifiers via Workflow, and reports residual surfaces with a structural fix for each. ONLY invoke when the user explicitly asks for a perfection / ideal-bar review.
Diagnose failed, stalled, or suspicious NVFLARE jobs in simulation, POC, or production by collecting bounded evidence and mapping failure patterns to recovery actions.
Check a golem Shiny application for package issues. Triggers on: - "check my golem app" - "run R CMD check" - "validate the package" Do not trigger on: - when the user is not working inside a golem app