Testing & Quality skills

Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.

whart-test

WHartTest测试管理平台工具集。用于管理项目、模块、测试用例的增删改查,以及测试截图上传。当用户需要操作测试用例、查询项目信息或上传截图时使用。

956 repo starsObserved in 1 repos
Testing & Quality

dd-debugger

Live Debugger - inspect runtime argument/variable values in production by placing log probes on methods. Use when asked what values a function receives, what parameters look like at runtime, or to capture live data from running services without redeploying.

954 repo starsObserved in 2 repos
Testing & Quality

dd-triage-flaky-test

Load when investigating a specific flaky test. Gets history, failure pattern, and category, then recommends fix, quarantine, or escalate.

954 repo starsObserved in 1 repos
Testing & Quality

nix-playwright

Use this when adding Nix-based local runs for an existing Playwright e2e suite. Provides a self-contained `tests/shell.nix` that uses `nixpkgs-latest` for `playwright-driver.browsers`, plus a justfile entry — works on NixOS where `npx playwright install --with-deps` cannot.

949 repo starsObserved in 2 repos
Testing & Quality

be-review

Run /be's review gauntlet SERIALLY — /lens-debate (lowy ⇄ hickey), then /codex-debate, then /simplify, then code-police, each editing and committing on the live branch in turn. Use from /be §4, or when the user asks to "run the review gauntlet". Requires Claude Code's Skill tool.

949 repo starsObserved in 1 repos
Testing & Quality

codex-debate

Run an automated codex⇄Claude debate to consensus — no round cap, no deadlock exit. Two explicit subcommands. `review` (also the bare/back-compat default) — codex (reviewer) critiques the current diff and a Claude subagent (author) fixes/disputes, looping until they agree. `answer` — Claude and codex each answer a freeform prompt in parallel, then cross-check until they agree, and a unified answer is returned. Use when the user types `/codex-debate`, asks to "have codex review this", "run the codex debate", "review this PR with codex", "argue this with codex until you agree", or passes a question to "have Claude and codex debate/answer until they agree".

949 repo starsObserved in 1 repos
Testing & Quality

lens-debate

Run a structural-review debate between two lenses — lowy (volatility-based decomposition) and hickey (structural simplicity) — on the current diff. Each reviews independently, then they cross-examine every finding until they agree per-finding, and the agreed fixes are applied. Use when the user types `/lens-debate`, or asks to "have lowy and hickey review this", "run the lens debate", "debate this diff structurally", or "argue the structure of this PR until the lenses agree".

949 repo starsObserved in 1 repos
Testing & Quality

perfection-review

Adversarial "perfection" review — hold a change to an *ideal* bar, not just a correct one, assuming eternal time, unlimited energy, and no ship pressure. Use when the user asks to review "for perfection", to make a defect "impossible to express", or to hunt where a defect "relocates" across review rounds. Grounds every claim in the diff, fans out adversarial verifiers via Workflow, and reports residual surfaces with a structural fix for each. ONLY invoke when the user explicitly asks for a perfection / ideal-bar review.

949 repo starsObserved in 1 repos
Testing & Quality

nvflare-diagnose-job

Diagnose failed, stalled, or suspicious NVFLARE jobs in simulation, POC, or production by collecting bounded evidence and mapping failure patterns to recovery actions.

947 repo starsObserved in 1 repos
Testing & Quality

golem-check-app

Check a golem Shiny application for package issues. Triggers on: - "check my golem app" - "run R CMD check" - "validate the package" Do not trigger on: - when the user is not working inside a golem app

943 repo starsObserved in 3 repos
Testing & Quality