Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
Strategy: Dialectic engine retuned for truth-seeking, not survival. A defender steelmans a claim into its MOST falsifiable form, a critic attacks to refute it, a judge classifies the exchange into BROKEN/CORROBORATED/UNFALSIFIABLE — the judge does NOT pick a winner or score persuasiveness. Methods: Irving debate (repurposed), Toulmin argumentation, Mayo severe testing.
Strategy: Role-play attacks from hostile personas — competing lab researcher, hostile reviewer, funding skeptic, domain outsider — each with distinct attack motivations and blind spots.
SOP: Use the AHRQ PiCMe framework to systematically assess a research gap across 6 dimensions
Classify gap root causes using AHRQ 4-reason framework (insufficient info, biased info, inconsistent info, not yet integrated).
Generate 2-4 divergent scenarios from the same evidence base, each representing a plausible alternative to the artifact's conclusions.
Generate alternative model formulations by relaxing, replacing, or generalizing specific assumptions.
Generate alternatives for every known approach — ensure no approach goes unchallenged.
Extract transferable structural principles from source domains. Orchestrates source identification → abstraction → structural mapping → transfer validation.
SOP: Describe and classify anomalous phenomena that existing theory cannot explain
Tactic: Inductive/abductive path — describe anomalous phenomena, generate candidate explanations, rank by plausibility