Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for a Production and Operations Management (POM) manuscript — proving and numerically illustrating an analytical model, or estimating and validating an empirical / behavioral / operations-data-science study. Executes and reports; it does not pick the method (pom-methods) or frame the contribution (pom-contribution-framing).
Use when selecting or auditing the method for a Production and Operations Management (POM) manuscript — analytical modeling (optimization, stochastic models, game theory), empirical identification, behavioral experiments, simulation, or operations data science. Matches method to the operations question; it does not execute the analysis (pom-data-analysis).
Use when understanding or planning for Production and Operations Management (POM) review — Department Editor screening, double-blind review, the rigor-and-practice evaluation, and the strict no-resubmission-after-rejection rule. Explains the process and reads decisions; it does not draft the response (pom-rebuttal).
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for a Population and Development Review (PDR, Wiley / Population Council) manuscript so it survives expert, double-anonymized review — correct rate construction, honest uncertainty, and demographic methods done right, with the development/policy meaning of each quantity made clear. Guides analysis and reporting norms; it does not fabricate results.
Use when defending the research design of a Population and Development Review (PDR, Wiley / Population Council) manuscript — choosing among demographic methods (life tables, decomposition, event-history, age-period-cohort, projections) and, where the question is causal, defending identification, with the population-and-development linkage made explicit. PDR judges each method on its own terms and asks what it shows about development. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.
Use when you need to understand how Population and Development Review (PDR, Wiley / Population Council) evaluates a manuscript — an editorial-committee screen before external review, double-anonymized peer review by at least two referees, and a typical ~3-month time to first decision. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.
Use when deciding whether a project is POPL-shaped — a principle about programming languages carried by definitions and theorems — or better aimed at PLDI's implementation bar, OOPSLA's breadth, ICFP's paradigm focus, or LICS, CAV, CPP, ESOP, and journal outlets, judged by what the decisive evidence is.
Use when defending the survey design and measurement of a Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) manuscript through the Total Survey Error framework — coverage, sampling, nonresponse, measurement (question wording/order/scales), mode effects, and weighting. POQ is the leading survey-methodology journal and expects AAPOR-standard rigor. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.
Use when reasoning about how a PPoPP submission is evaluated, covering double-blind review, the Program Committee plus External/Extended Review Committee model, TPMS reviewer matching, the author-response rebuttal, the accept/reject decision with automatic poster consideration, and how PPoPP's process differs from PLDI's and CGO's.
Use when appraising the credibility of the studies a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) piece synthesizes and calibrating comprehensiveness, balance, and fair treatment of competing camps — including reform-minded but evidence-based critique. Weighs evidence and audits even-handedness; it does not design the spine (ppsych-organizing-framework) or run new analyses.