Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for a Manufacturing & Service Operations Management (M&SOM) manuscript — proving structural results and running numerical studies for analytical work, or estimating and stress-testing identified effects for empirical work, plus meeting M&SOM's data-and-code replicability policy. Executes the analysis designed in msom-methods.
Use to understand how Manufacturing & Service Operations Management (M&SOM) review and decisions work — the author-routed six-department structure, the Department Editor / Associate Editor / referee chain, double-anonymous review, special tracks (OM Forum, Practice Platform, OM Grand Challenges), and how to read a decision letter — before or after submitting.
Use when shaping or stress-testing a research question for Manufacturing & Service Operations Management (M&SOM) — confirming an operations decision is central, choosing the analytical-vs-empirical lane, and matching the question to the right editorial Department before any modeling or data work begins.
Use when targeting Music Theory Spectrum or deciding whether a music-theory manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, its argument and analytical-method bar, notational and close-analysis expectations, house style and review norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when the empirical identification strategy is the bottleneck for a Management-World manuscript — quasi-experimental designs (DID, IV, RDD, DML, event study) with Chinese policy shocks. Stress-tests the design before drafting tables.
用于为《管理世界》实证稿件设计与撰写机制检验和异质性分析，从"政策有效"走向"为何有效、对谁有效"。Use when 主回归已稳健但缺机制证据、异质性切分颗粒度不够（只切国企/非国企或东中西）、中介只跑 Sobel、或审稿人追问"为什么会有这个效应"时使用。锚定《管理世界》国务院发展研究中心主办、管理学与经济学并重、规范的机制检验与企业微观异质性传统，落实因果中介、有理论指引的分层切分与系数差异检验，几乎所有本刊实证投稿都需要本环节。 本技能服务于《管理世界》(Management World, MW)。
Use when designing or auditing the experimental program of a NAACL submission — matching evidence to language-coverage claims, keeping cross-lingual comparisons budget-fair, testing on natively authored rather than translated data where the claim requires it, and reporting variance that survives reviewer probing.
Use when reasoning about how a NAACL decision actually gets made — the division of labor between ACL Rolling Review (reviews, meta-review) and the NAACL program committee (commitment-stage acceptance into Main or Findings), where author leverage exists at each stage, and how the skipped-year calendar shapes committee behavior.
Use when deciding whether a project should target NAACL rather than ACL, EMNLP, EACL, AACL, LREC-COLING, TACL, or an ML venue — weighing the chapter's Nations-of-the-Americas identity, theme tracks, timing across skipped years, and whether the paper's audience actually convenes at this conference.
Use when targeting National Science Review (NSR) or deciding whether a multidisciplinary manuscript fits China's flagship broad-science journal (OUP/CAS). Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.