Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
Use when interpreting where a CSCW paper stands in review — the PACMHCI journal model's decision vocabulary (Revise for External Review, Revise and Resubmit, Conditional Accept), same-reviewer re-review, the rolling editorial board, and what each outcome statistically implied in the last cycle.
Use when deciding whether a project belongs at CSCW — is the group, community, or organization the real unit of analysis? — and running the routing decision against CHI, ICWSM, DIS, GROUP, TOCHI, and social-science journals before any drafting or platform account setup begins.
在为《计算机科学》(Computer Science, JSJKX) 设计与呈现实验章节时调用。本刊是计算机全学科中文综合月刊(CCF 会刊、B 类、T2 级)，单盲审稿。技能帮助以研究问题(RQ)驱动组织实验、选择公平且有代表性的基线、规范数据集与评价指标、报告统计显著性与方差、设计消融与敏感性分析、给出中英文题注的图表，并覆盖不同栏目(AI/网络/信息安全/数据库/系统等)的证据惯例。适用于把实证证据搭到能通过本刊外审、支撑摘要中量化结论的场景。
在需要理解《计算机科学》(Computer Science, JSJKX) 审稿流程与各环节作者杠杆时调用。本刊是计算机全学科中文综合月刊(CCF 会刊、B 类、T2 级)，采用单盲审稿制(作者不知审稿人、审稿人知作者)。技能建模编辑初审→专家外审→复审退修→主编终审→修回的流程，说明各环节判据、可能结果(录用/小修/大修/退稿)、时间预期(具体周期待核实)与作者在每一步能做什么。适用于投稿后判断稿件所处阶段、评估修回策略、管理预期的场景。
Use when the empirical identification strategy is the bottleneck for a 《财贸经济》 manuscript — fiscal / tax / financial / trade policy shocks and firm- / city- / bank-level quasi-experimental designs (DID, IV, RDD, DML). Stress-tests the design and the policy endogeneity before drafting tables. 本技能服务于《财贸经济》(Finance & Trade Economics, CTE)。
Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a 《财贸经济》 manuscript, when the Chinese / English reference balance is off, or when canonical fiscal / financial / trade theory references are missing. 本技能服务于《财贸经济》(Finance & Trade Economics, CTE)。
Use when executing and reporting the analysis/interpretation for a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript so it survives expert review and the published CA✩ Comments — disciplined ethnographic/qualitative inference, honest interpretation, and (for biological/archaeological work) sound quantitative analysis. Guides analysis and interpretation norms; it does not fabricate evidence or quotations.
Use when defending the research design of a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript — fieldwork and participant observation, interview and archival design for ethnographic/qualitative work, material/contextual analysis for archaeology, and appropriate lab/quantitative design for biological anthropology. CA judges each mode on its own terms with reflexivity, and the design must survive published CA✩ Comments. Strengthens the design; it does not write code or run fieldwork.
Use when you need to understand how Current Anthropology (CA) evaluates a manuscript — editorial screening, peer review, and the distinctive CA✩ Treatment in which an accepted Major Article is sent to invited commentators whose signed Comments are published alongside it, followed by the author's Reply. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive both review and public commentary; it does not contact editors.
Use when targeting Current Biology or deciding whether a general-biology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.