Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
Use when choosing and justifying the research design for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — qualitative (grounded-theory, ethnographic, historical) or quantitative — and setting the rigor bar. Designs the study; it does not run the analysis (see asq-data-analysis).
Use when understanding and navigating Administrative Science Quarterly's (ASQ) developmental, multi-round review process — decision types, reviewer/editor roles, and what each stage expects. Explains the process; it does not draft the response letter (see asq-rebuttal).
Use when judging whether a research idea fits Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) and has the *surprising* theoretical insight ASQ demands. Sharpens the puzzle and the contribution claim; it does not design the study or write theory sections.
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for an American Sociological Review (ASR) manuscript so it survives expert masked review — honest uncertainty, robustness, and evidence handling appropriate to quantitative, demographic, comparative-historical, or computational sociology. Guides analysis norms; it does not fabricate results.
Use when defending the research design of an American Sociological Review (ASR) manuscript — causal/observational inference for quantitative and demographic work, case selection and comparison for comparative-historical work, site and informant logic for ethnography, and network/computational designs. ASR judges each tradition on its own terms. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.
Use to understand how the American Sociological Review (ASR) evaluates a manuscript — masked (anonymous) peer review, what reviewers across sociological traditions weigh, decision categories, and the ethics rules (no simultaneous submission). Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.
Use when reasoning about how an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) submission is evaluated — the two-round extended-abstract model, the round-one gate by two reviewers, the round-two read by 3-4 reviewers, double-blind reviewing, rebuttal, conditional acceptance with shepherding, and how ATC differs from OSDI/SOSP/NSDI.
Use when targeting Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP) or deciding whether an atmospheric-composition manuscript fits this open-access, interactive-peer-review venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when targeting 《审计研究》(Auditing Research — 审计署主管、中国审计学会主办、匿名审稿、不收版面费的审计权威核心双月刊) or deciding whether a Chinese auditing manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, abstract/keyword/citation house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when targeting Automatica or deciding whether a systems-and-control manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the methodological-breadth-with-guarantees bar, theory rigor, the Automatica-vs-TAC routing, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.