Research skills

Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.

radiology-reporting

Route an imaging-research manuscript or protocol to the correct reporting/quality guideline and audit it item-by-item for Radiology (RSNA) or Nature-portfolio submission. Use when the user mentions CLAIM, TRIPOD+AI, STARD, PRISMA-DTA, QUADAS-2, CLEAR, METRICS, RQS, IBSI, PROBAST, CONSORT-AI, FUTURE-AI, TRIPOD-LLM, the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary / Editorial Policy Checklist, a "reporting checklist", "what's required for submission", radiomics quality, or wants to know what a reviewer will check. Produces a filled checklist with PRESENT / PARTIAL / MISSING per item, manuscript location, and concrete fixes. Do not fabricate compliance — flag missing items honestly.

819 repo starsObserved in 1 repos
Research
GitHub

radiology-search

Multi-source literature, dataset, and local-corpus search for imaging research, with deduplication, identifier verification, reference management, and survey/RAG workflow support. Searches PubMed, arXiv, Crossref, and imaging dataset registries (TCIA, GEO, cBioPortal, OpenNeuro, Grand Challenge, Medical Segmentation Decathlon), and can structure local paper/RAG workflows when a paper database, PaperQA2, NotebookLM, or paperpipe-style backend exists. Use when the user wants to find papers/datasets, run systematic or survey-level search, verify DOI/PMID/arXiv IDs, map a field, build a gap matrix, or synthesize literature for a manuscript. Verifies identifiers and exposes incomplete metadata; never fabricates bibliographic fields.

819 repo starsObserved in 1 repos
Research
GitHub

radiology-skills

Use when planning, auditing, writing, or revising radiomics, medical imaging AI, and radiology deep learning studies for Radiology/RSNA, Nature-portfolio, Lancet, Cell, npj, European Radiology, or similar venues. Trigger for research frontiers, literature, CT/MRI/PET/ultrasound datasets, ROI/masks/segmentation annotation, radiomics features, CNN/Transformer/foundation models, trustworthy AI, FUTURE-AI, uncertainty/OOD/interpretability, radiogenomics and multi-omics mechanisms, statistics, figures, pre-submission review, reproducibility, multicenter validation, public datasets, ethics/privacy, clinical translation, validation/leakage, CLAIM/CLEAR/RQS/IBSI/TRIPOD+AI/PROBAST+AI/STARD-AI, manuscript writing, journal selection, NSFC/provincial/international grants, reviewer response, and Chinese-English support.

819 repo starsObserved in 1 repos
Research
GitHub

web-search-tool

提供网页搜索功能示例，演示如何使用 curl 进行 HTTP 请求。用于学习如何构建包含 scripts 和 references 的标准 skill 结构。

807 repo starsObserved in 1 repos
Research
GitHub

academy-of-management-annals

Use when targeting Academy of Management Annals (AMA) or deciding whether a management / organizational review or integrative article fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, contribution bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

805 repo starsObserved in 3 repos
Research
GitHub

academy-of-management-journal

Use when targeting Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) or deciding whether a management / organizational research manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

805 repo starsObserved in 3 repos
Research
GitHub

accounting-research

Use when targeting 《会计研究》(Accounting Research) — the top accounting journal of the Accounting Society of China. Apply to financial accounting, auditing, management accounting, disclosure/governance, and tax papers, emphasizing archival capital-market identification, accurate institutional/standard-setting detail, and contribution to accounting theory and practice. Distinguishes accounting framings from generic corporate finance.

805 repo starsObserved in 3 repos
Research
GitHub

aerj-review-process

Use to understand how an American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) manuscript will be judged — masked/double-anonymous peer review, desk screening, integrated-journal fit, and decision categories. Sets expectations and informs strategy; it does not contact editors or reviewers.

805 repo starsObserved in 3 repos
Research
GitHub

ahr-review-process

Use to understand how The American Historical Review (AHR) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind anonymous review by at least six scholars, a six-to-eight-month timeline, an 8-10% acceptance rate, and the large commissioned book/media review section. Sets expectations and shapes the article to survive review; it does not contact editors.

805 repo starsObserved in 3 repos
Research
GitHub

ajps-review-process

Use to understand how the American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind peer review, desk screening, decision categories, the methodology-only Research Note and Correspondence routes, and the third-party verification that follows acceptance. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

805 repo starsObserved in 3 repos
Research
GitHub