write-update-tidb-docs

Write or Update TiDB Docs

Act as a senior technical writer who has profound knowledge of TiDB. Your task is to write or update user-facing Chinese TiDB documentation in pingcap/docs-cn based on code changes, PRs, issues, design docs, product specs, rough drafts, existing docs, or short feature descriptions.

Quick start

This is an overview of the full workflow below — the create-vs-update decision is made in Step 4, not before.

1. Load shared context (Step 1).
2. Analyze the input and determine the target branch (Steps 2–3).
3. Decide create vs. update (Step 4), then load one reference file:
   • Creating a new page → read ref-create-new-doc.md (same directory)
   • Updating existing page(s) → read ref-update-existing-doc.md (same directory)
4. Follow that reference file's workflow end-to-end.

English-first vs. Chinese-original content

Decide early whether this content should originate in English:

• Many TiDB docs are authored in English in pingcap/docs and then translated into pingcap/docs-cn. If the same content is needed in both languages, coordinate so the English and Chinese sides stay traceable. When the English source already exists or is being written, prefer translating it (see .agents/shared/translation-rules.md) over writing an independent Chinese version that can drift.
• The ai/ content is AI-translated weekly from pingcap/docs (release-8.5). Do not write or edit it directly here; author the English source in pingcap/docs.
• Some Chinese-original content has no English counterpart. In that case, write it directly in this repository following the workflow below.

Ground every fact in the source

Documentation generated from code fails most often by being well-formatted but factually wrong. Before writing any specific value, follow these rules:

• Every concrete fact — default value, range, type, scope, version number, behavior, error message, syntax — must be traceable to an authoritative source: the PR diff, the code, tests, or an existing doc.
• Never infer or invent a value because it "looks reasonable." A plausible-but-wrong default is worse than an acknowledged gap.
• If a fact cannot be derived from the available sources, do not guess and do not bury an unverified value in the prose. Track it under Open questions in the plan and the completion report. A placeholder such as <!-- TODO: confirm default --> is allowed only as a temporary local drafting marker: it must be resolved before the task is complete, and it must never remain in a document that is committed or proposed in a PR. Do not mark the task done while any placeholder remains.
• When the source and an existing doc disagree, note the conflict under Open questions in the plan instead of silently picking one.

Accepted inputs

Multiple inputs can be combined. More context = fewer questions needed.

Defaults

• Inspect first, confirm when uncertain, then edit.
• Prefer updating existing docs over creating new pages.
• Not every code change needs a doc update. Documentation must justify its maintenance cost.
• Write in Chinese, following .agents/shared/writing-style.md and resources/tidb-terms.md. Keep product names, commands, flags, paths, and config keys in English.
• If the user asks about local changes without naming files, start with git status -u or git show --name-status.

Step 1: Load shared context

Always read before making any doc changes:

• .agents/shared/repo-conventions.md
• .agents/shared/writing-style.md

Read only when relevant:

• .agents/shared/translation-rules.md and .agents/shared/translation-terms.md — when translation from pingcap/docs is involved
• resources/tidb-terms.md — when terminology is uncertain

Step 2: Analyze the input

From a code PR

gh pr view <PR-URL> --json title,body,labels,baseRefName,headRefName,files
gh pr diff <PR-URL>

Scan for documentation-relevant patterns. This table is for triage — deciding whether docs are affected and which area. For the exact target-file mapping with specific file paths, see ref-update-existing-doc.md.

Focus on user-facing changes. Skip internal refactors that do not affect behavior.

From a product spec, issue, or design doc

Extract:

1. What can users now do, configure, or observe that they could not before?
2. Which components are affected?
3. Which versions will include this?
4. Any constraints, limitations, or compatibility concerns?

From rough notes or verbal description

Extract key user-facing facts. Ask focused questions only for facts that cannot be derived from code, tests, or existing docs.

Step 3: Determine the target branch and version

Target branch

Follow the repository's cherry-pick model (see .agents/shared/repo-conventions.md): default to a single PR on the latest applicable branch (usually master) and rely on cherry-pick labels for other maintained versions, rather than opening parallel PRs per branch. When in doubt, target master.

Version number for "从 vX.Y 起" notes

Many entries need a precise version (for example, "本变量从 vX.Y 起引入"). Determine it from the source — do not guess:

• Code PR: derive from the PR milestone, the target release branch, or the next unreleased version on master.
• Spec/issue/design doc: use the stated target version.

If the version cannot be determined from the source, mark it with a placeholder and list it under Open questions instead of inventing a number.

Step 4: Decide — create new page or update existing

Ask these questions:

1. Does this change have a natural home in an existing page?
2. Would adding it to an existing page make that page too long or dilute its focus?
3. Does it introduce a distinct user task or feature that needs standalone discoverability?
4. Is there enough substance for a standalone page (≥3 meaningful sections)?

Then follow the loaded reference file's workflow from start to finish.

Shared gotchas

These apply to both creating and updating:

• The ai/ content is AI-translated weekly from pingcap/docs. Edit the English source there, not the Chinese copy here.
• Do not change CustomContent blocks without understanding platform-specific rendering.
• Do not silently broaden scope from a targeted fix into cross-file rewrites.
• Preserve code samples, commands, SQL, config names, API fields, JSON, EBNF, and UI strings unless the task requires changing them or they are clearly wrong.
• Apply Chinese writing conventions: Chinese/English spacing, full-width punctuation in prose, and terminology from resources/tidb-terms.md.

Where this skill stops

This skill produces local edits + validation + a completion report. It does not create branches, commit, push, or open a PR on its own.

• After editing and validating, report the changed files and follow-ups, then stop.
• Create a branch, commit, or open a PR only when the user explicitly asks, or hand off to the workflow the user prefers.
• Release notes and PR creation are separate steps — flag them as follow-ups rather than doing them inline.

Coordinating with other skills and workflows

Output format

Plan (before editing):

Target: <branch/path>
Source: <PR URL, issue, spec, or description>
Action: <create new page | update existing | both>
Doc type: <task | concept | reference | new feature | troubleshooting>
Outline: <heading list>
Related updates: <TOC, links, overview, release notes>
Open questions: <facts needing confirmation>

Completion report:

Changed files:
- <path>: <what changed>

Source: <link or description>

Validation:
- <check>: <result>

Follow-up:
- <release notes, English source coordination, or other needs>