Readme Refresh
Documentsreadme-refreshReadme Refresh is an Agent Skill for documents published in the joshukraine/dotfiles repository on GitHub: a SKILL.md instruction file an AI agent can load to do this task.
Audit and update a project README, or bootstrap a new one. Detects tech stack, versions, and services.
How to use this skill
Bring this guide into your coding agent with a prompt tailored to the tool you use.
- Open your project in Codex.
- Copy and paste the prompt below.
- Review files and risks before approving any action.
Inspect the Agent Skill at https://github.com/joshukraine/dotfiles/blob/HEAD/claude/.claude/skills/readme-refresh/SKILL.md and all supporting files. Report provenance, permissions, scripts, dependencies, and security risks. Propose an exact installation into .agents/skills/readme-refresh, but wait for my approval before writing files or running scripts.
Copying this prompt does not install or run the skill. Review third-party files before use.
README Refresh
Audit and update the project README, or bootstrap one if it doesn't exist. The README is a living document — it evolves with the code and should always reflect the current state of the project.
Command Options
--bootstrap: Force bootstrap mode even if a README exists (useful to start fresh)
Your task
Step 0: Detect mode
- If
README.mdexists at the project root and--bootstrapwas not passed: enter Refresh mode (Step 1). - If
README.mddoes not exist or--bootstrapwas passed: enter Bootstrap mode (Step 5).
Refresh Mode
Step 1: Scan the project
Gather facts from the codebase. Do not rely on the README's current claims — verify independently.
Tech stack and versions:
- Ruby version:
.ruby-version,Gemfile.lock(RUBY VERSIONsection),.tool-versions - Rails version:
Gemfile.lock(search forrails () - Node version:
.node-version,.nvmrc,.tool-versions,package.json(engines) - Database:
config/database.yml,Gemfile.lock(pg, mysql2, sqlite3) - Key framework gems/packages: Devise, Turbo, Stimulus, Tailwind, Solid Queue, etc. — scan
Gemfileorpackage.jsonfor notable dependencies
Services and infrastructure:
- Hosting:
fly.toml(Fly.io),netlify.toml,Procfile,render.yaml,app.json(Heroku),Dockerfile,docker-compose.yml - Storage: look for Active Storage config, S3/Tigris credentials in
config/storage.yml - Email:
config/environments/production.rb(SMTP settings,action_mailerconfig), initializers for Postmark/SendGrid/etc. - Background jobs:
config/application.rbor initializers (Solid Queue, Sidekiq, etc.) - Search: Elasticsearch, Meilisearch, etc.
Available commands:
bin/directory: list executable scripts (bin/rails,bin/dev,bin/ci,bin/setup, etc.)Procfile.devorProcfile: processes defined for local developmentMakefileorTaskfile: custom task definitionspackage.jsonscripts section
Configuration requirements:
.env.exampleor.env.template: expected environment variablesconfig/credentials.yml.encorconfig/master.key: credentials setupconfig/database.yml: database setup requirements
CI/CD:
.github/workflows/: GitHub Actions workflows.circleci/,.travis.yml,Jenkinsfile: other CI configs
Step 2: Compare against the README
Read the current README.md and compare each claim against the facts gathered in Step 1. Build a findings report with three categories:
- Outdated — the README states something that is no longer accurate (e.g., "Rails 7.1" when
Gemfile.lockshows Rails 8.0, or mentions a service that has been removed). - Missing — something exists in the project that the README doesn't mention and reasonably should (e.g., a
bin/devscript for local development, a background job processor, a CI workflow). - Stale references — commands, URLs, or setup steps that no longer work or point to things that don't exist.
Do not flag:
- Prose descriptions of what the app does (subjective — leave to the human).
- Stylistic preferences (heading structure, badge choices, etc.).
- Items that are genuinely optional to document.
Step 3: Present findings
CHECKPOINT: Present the findings report to the user. Format:
README Refresh — Findings
==========================
Outdated (N items):
✗ Ruby version: README says 3.3.0, project uses 4.0.1
✗ Rails version: README says 7.1, Gemfile.lock shows 8.0.1
✗ References Redis for caching, but project uses Solid Cache
Missing (N items):
+ bin/dev script not documented (starts Procfile.dev with foreman)
+ Postmark configured for transactional email — not mentioned
+ GitHub Actions CI workflow exists — not documented
Stale references (N items):
⚠ Setup step 3 references `rake db:seed` — project uses `bin/rails db:seed`
⚠ Link to API docs points to a 404
No issues found: (list any sections that are current and accurate)
Ask: "Want me to apply the mechanical fixes? I'll update versions, add missing sections, and remove stale references. I won't rewrite prose descriptions."
Step 4: Apply fixes
For each confirmed finding:
- Outdated versions/facts: Update to the verified value from Step 1.
- Missing sections: Add a concise section with the verified information. Match the existing README's style and heading level conventions.
- Stale references: Fix or remove. If a command changed, update it. If a link is dead and no replacement is obvious, comment it out with a note.
After applying changes:
- Show a diff summary of what was changed.
- Do not commit automatically — let the user review and commit when ready (or offer to commit it for them).
Bootstrap Mode
Step 5: Scan the project
Run the same scan as Step 1 to gather project facts.
Step 6: Detect project type and generate README
Based on the scan results, generate a README with these sections (omit any that don't apply):
- Project name and description — use the repo name as a heading. Add a one-line placeholder:
<!-- TODO: Add project description -->. Do not invent a description. - Tech stack — list detected language, framework, database, and key dependencies with verified versions.
- Prerequisites — what needs to be installed before setup (Ruby, Node, PostgreSQL, etc.) with version requirements.
- Setup — step-by-step local development setup based on what exists:
bin/setup,bundle install,bin/rails db:prepare,.envconfiguration, etc. Only include steps that the project actually needs. - Development — how to run the app locally (
bin/dev,bin/rails server, etc.), how to run tests, how to run the linter. - Deployment — if hosting config is detected (fly.toml, netlify.toml, etc.), document the deployment target and any relevant commands.
- Services — external services the app depends on (email provider, object storage, background jobs, etc.).
- Documentation — if a
docs/directory exists, mention it and list key documents (PRD, domain model, etc.).
Step 7: Present and write
CHECKPOINT: Present the generated README to the user for review.
Write the file to README.md at the project root. Do not commit — let the user review and commit when ready.
Important
- This skill inspects and reports. It does not refactor code, change configuration, or install dependencies.
- Prose and subjective descriptions are the human's domain. The command handles mechanical, verifiable facts.
- The command is framework-aware but not framework-specific. The scan in Step 1 covers Rails, Node, Python, Go, Rust, and Hugo projects. For unrecognized stacks, fall back to checking common files (
Makefile,Dockerfile,docker-compose.yml,README.md). - When in doubt about whether something belongs in the README, include it in the findings report and let the user decide.
- If the project has a
CLAUDE.md, read it for additional context about conventions, but do not documentCLAUDE.mditself in the README (it is tooling-specific, not project documentation).
Lifecycle Context
This is a living-document maintenance command (→ See spec-driven-development.md §5 "Document Lifecycle"). The README is never frozen — it evolves with the code.
| Project Stage | README Refresh Focus |
|---|---|
| Greenfield | Bootstrap mode. Generate initial README as setup docs solidify. |
| MVP complete | Full refresh. The README likely drifted during rapid development. |
| Mature | Light periodic refresh. Versions and dependencies are the main drift vectors. |
Suggested cadence: Run after phase boundaries, after /update-deps, or whenever the project feels like it has accumulated untracked changes. A good rule of thumb: if you'd be embarrassed for a new contributor to read the README, it's time.