OpenParable
Skip to content
← Back to skills

Nlp Toolkit Guide

Documents
nlp-toolkit-guide

Nlp Toolkit Guide is an Agent Skill for documents published in the brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills repository on GitHub: a SKILL.md instruction file an AI agent can load to do this task.

NLP analysis with perplexity scoring, burstiness, and entropy metrics

View on GitHub ↗
QUICK START

How to use this skill

Bring this guide into your coding agent with a prompt tailored to the tool you use.

  1. Open your project in Codex.
  2. Copy and paste the prompt below.
  3. Review files and risks before approving any action.
Prompt to paste
Inspect the Agent Skill at https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills/blob/HEAD/skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/domains/ai-ml/nlp-toolkit-guide/SKILL.md and all supporting files. Report provenance, permissions, scripts, dependencies, and security risks. Propose an exact installation into .agents/skills/nlp-toolkit-guide, but wait for my approval before writing files or running scripts.

Copying this prompt does not install or run the skill. Review third-party files before use.

NLP Toolkit Guide

Overview

Natural Language Processing research requires a diverse set of analytical tools beyond standard model training. Text quality assessment, AI-generated text detection, linguistic feature extraction, and corpus analysis all depend on well-understood metrics: perplexity, burstiness, entropy, and their variants.

This guide provides practical implementations of these core NLP metrics alongside patterns for tokenization, embedding analysis, and text feature engineering. The focus is on metrics used in active research areas -- AI text detection (perplexity + burstiness classifiers), information-theoretic analysis of corpora, and linguistic diversity measurement.

These tools are framework-agnostic where possible, but leverage Hugging Face Transformers for language model operations and standard Python scientific computing libraries for statistical analysis.

Perplexity Scoring

Perplexity measures how well a language model predicts a text. Lower perplexity means the text is more predictable to the model -- a key signal in AI text detection, model evaluation, and domain adaptation.

import torch
import numpy as np
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer

def compute_perplexity(text: str, model_name: str = "gpt2") -> dict:
    """
    Compute token-level and text-level perplexity using a causal LM.

    Returns:
        dict with 'perplexity', 'log_likelihood', 'token_perplexities'
    """
    tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
    model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name)
    model.eval()

    encodings = tokenizer(text, return_tensors="pt", truncation=True, max_length=1024)
    input_ids = encodings.input_ids

    with torch.no_grad():
        outputs = model(input_ids, labels=input_ids)
        neg_log_likelihood = outputs.loss.item()

    # Token-level perplexities for analysis
    with torch.no_grad():
        logits = outputs.logits[:, :-1, :]  # Shift for next-token prediction
        targets = input_ids[:, 1:]
        log_probs = torch.log_softmax(logits, dim=-1)
        token_log_probs = log_probs.gather(2, targets.unsqueeze(-1)).squeeze(-1)
        token_perplexities = torch.exp(-token_log_probs).squeeze().tolist()

    perplexity = np.exp(neg_log_likelihood)

    return {
        "perplexity": perplexity,
        "log_likelihood": -neg_log_likelihood,
        "token_perplexities": token_perplexities,
        "num_tokens": input_ids.size(1),
    }

Burstiness Analysis

Burstiness measures the tendency of words to appear in clusters rather than uniformly across a text. Human writing tends to be "burstier" -- once a topic is introduced, related terms cluster together, then disappear.

from collections import Counter
import numpy as np

def compute_burstiness(text: str, min_freq: int = 2) -> dict:
    """
    Compute burstiness score for a text.

    Burstiness B = (sigma - mu) / (sigma + mu)
    where sigma and mu are the std dev and mean of inter-arrival times.
    B ranges from -1 (periodic) to 1 (bursty). Human text typically B > 0.
    """
    words = text.lower().split()
    word_positions = {}
    for i, word in enumerate(words):
        word_positions.setdefault(word, []).append(i)

    burstiness_scores = {}
    for word, positions in word_positions.items():
        if len(positions) < min_freq:
            continue
        inter_arrivals = np.diff(positions)
        mu = np.mean(inter_arrivals)
        sigma = np.std(inter_arrivals)
        if mu + sigma == 0:
            burstiness_scores[word] = 0.0
        else:
            burstiness_scores[word] = (sigma - mu) / (sigma + mu)

    # Aggregate burstiness
    if burstiness_scores:
        avg_burstiness = np.mean(list(burstiness_scores.values()))
    else:
        avg_burstiness = 0.0

    return {
        "average_burstiness": avg_burstiness,
        "word_burstiness": burstiness_scores,
        "num_words_analyzed": len(burstiness_scores),
    }

Entropy and Information-Theoretic Metrics

from collections import Counter
import numpy as np

def compute_entropy(text: str, level: str = "word") -> dict:
    """
    Compute Shannon entropy at word or character level.

    Higher entropy indicates more diverse, less predictable text.
    AI-generated text often has lower entropy than human text.
    """
    if level == "word":
        tokens = text.lower().split()
    elif level == "character":
        tokens = list(text.lower())
    else:
        raise ValueError("level must be 'word' or 'character'")

    counts = Counter(tokens)
    total = sum(counts.values())
    probabilities = np.array([c / total for c in counts.values()])

    entropy = -np.sum(probabilities * np.log2(probabilities + 1e-12))
    max_entropy = np.log2(len(counts)) if len(counts) > 1 else 1.0
    normalized_entropy = entropy / max_entropy

    return {
        "entropy": entropy,
        "normalized_entropy": normalized_entropy,
        "vocabulary_size": len(counts),
        "total_tokens": total,
        "type_token_ratio": len(counts) / total,
    }

def compute_conditional_entropy(text: str, n: int = 2) -> float:
    """Compute conditional entropy H(X_n | X_{n-1}) for n-gram analysis."""
    words = text.lower().split()
    if len(words) < n:
        return 0.0

    ngrams = [tuple(words[i:i+n]) for i in range(len(words) - n + 1)]
    contexts = [ng[:-1] for ng in ngrams]

    context_counts = Counter(contexts)
    ngram_counts = Counter(ngrams)

    h = 0.0
    total = len(ngrams)
    for ngram, count in ngram_counts.items():
        context = ngram[:-1]
        p_ngram = count / total
        p_context = context_counts[context] / total
        h -= p_ngram * np.log2(count / context_counts[context] + 1e-12)

    return h

AI Text Detection Pipeline

Combining perplexity, burstiness, and entropy into a detection pipeline:

def analyze_text_authenticity(text: str) -> dict:
    """
    Multi-signal analysis for AI vs. human text classification.
    Uses perplexity, burstiness, and entropy as features.
    """
    perplexity_result = compute_perplexity(text)
    burstiness_result = compute_burstiness(text)
    entropy_result = compute_entropy(text, level="word")
    char_entropy = compute_entropy(text, level="character")

    # Heuristic thresholds from literature
    signals = {
        "low_perplexity": perplexity_result["perplexity"] < 30,
        "low_burstiness": burstiness_result["average_burstiness"] < 0.1,
        "low_entropy": entropy_result["normalized_entropy"] < 0.7,
        "uniform_token_ppl": np.std(perplexity_result["token_perplexities"]) < 5,
    }

    ai_score = sum(signals.values()) / len(signals)

    return {
        "perplexity": perplexity_result["perplexity"],
        "burstiness": burstiness_result["average_burstiness"],
        "word_entropy": entropy_result["entropy"],
        "char_entropy": char_entropy["entropy"],
        "type_token_ratio": entropy_result["type_token_ratio"],
        "ai_likelihood_score": ai_score,
        "signals": signals,
    }

Tokenization Patterns

from transformers import AutoTokenizer

def compare_tokenizers(text: str, models: list = None) -> dict:
    """Compare tokenization across different models for research analysis."""
    if models is None:
        models = ["gpt2", "bert-base-uncased", "facebook/opt-1.3b"]

    results = {}
    for model_name in models:
        tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
        tokens = tokenizer.tokenize(text)
        results[model_name] = {
            "num_tokens": len(tokens),
            "tokens": tokens[:50],  # First 50 for inspection
            "vocab_size": tokenizer.vocab_size,
            "compression_ratio": len(text) / len(tokens),
        }
    return results

Best Practices

  • Always specify the model when computing perplexity. Perplexity is model-relative, not absolute.
  • Normalize by text length when comparing entropy across texts of different sizes.
  • Use sliding windows for long documents to capture local variation in metrics.
  • Combine multiple signals for AI text detection -- no single metric is reliable alone.
  • Report confidence intervals by computing metrics on paragraph-level chunks, then aggregating.
  • Be aware of domain shift. Perplexity thresholds trained on news text will not transfer to scientific papers.

References