OpenParable
Skip to content
← Back to skills

Nda Analyser

Documents
nda-analyser

Nda Analyser is an Agent Skill for documents published in the majiayu000/claude-skill-registry repository on GitHub: a SKILL.md instruction file an AI agent can load to do this task.

Analyse a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) and flag key terms, unusual provisions, and negotiation points. Use when asked to review an NDA, mutual NDA, confidentiality agreement, or non-disclosure deed. Produces clause-by-clause analysis with risk flags and a negotiation checklist.

View on GitHub ↗
QUICK START

How to use this skill

Bring this guide into your coding agent with a prompt tailored to the tool you use.

  1. Open your project in Codex.
  2. Copy and paste the prompt below.
  3. Review files and risks before approving any action.
Prompt to paste
Inspect the Agent Skill at https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/blob/HEAD/skills/analysis/nda-analyser/SKILL.md and all supporting files. Report provenance, permissions, scripts, dependencies, and security risks. Propose an exact installation into .agents/skills/nda-analyser, but wait for my approval before writing files or running scripts.

Copying this prompt does not install or run the skill. Review third-party files before use.

NDA Analyser Skill

NDAs are often treated as routine paperwork but contain terms with significant long-term consequences. This skill analyses them systematically.

Required Inputs

  • NDA text (paste in full or describe key clauses)
  • Your party position (disclosing / receiving / mutual)
  • Purpose of the NDA (e.g. pre-sales, hiring, M&A, partnership)
  • Industry context (optional)

Output Structure

1. NDA Type and Parties

  • Type: Unilateral / Mutual
  • Disclosing party: [Name]
  • Receiving party: [Name]
  • Purpose: [As stated]
  • Governing law: [Jurisdiction]
  • Term: [Duration of obligations]

2. Definition of Confidential Information

  • How broadly defined? Narrow / Standard / Very broad
  • Oral disclosures included? Yes / No / With conditions
  • Standard exclusions present? [public domain, prior knowledge, independently developed, legally required disclosure]
  • Flag: [Unusual inclusions or missing exclusions]

3. Key Clause Analysis

[Clause name] — Concern / Watch / Standard

  • What it says: [Plain English]
  • Issue: [Why flagged]
  • Standard position: [What this typically looks like]
  • Negotiation suggestion: [If applicable]

Clauses always covered: permitted use, non-solicitation/non-compete, term and post-termination obligations, return/destruction of information, remedies, liability, residuals clause.

4. Negotiation Checklist

PointCurrent positionSuggested ask
[e.g. Confidentiality term][e.g. 5 years][e.g. Reduce to 2 years]

5. Plain English Verdict

2-3 sentences. Standard NDA, one-sided, or needs a lawyer?


WARNING: This analysis is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified solicitor before signing.

Quality Checks

  • Definition of confidential information assessed for scope (narrow / standard / very broad)
  • Residuals clause checked (allows memory use of disclosed information — high-risk)
  • Non-solicitation / non-compete provisions flagged
  • Post-termination obligations duration noted
  • Plain English verdict given (standard / one-sided / needs lawyer)
  • Disclaimer is included

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Analyse this NDA"
  • "Review this confidentiality agreement"
  • "Is this NDA standard or unusual?"
  • "What should I negotiate in this mutual NDA?"