Ln 600 Docs Auditor
Documentsln-600-docs-auditorLn 600 Docs Auditor is an Agent Skill for documents published in the majiayu000/claude-skill-registry repository on GitHub: a SKILL.md instruction file an AI agent can load to do this task.
Audit project documentation quality across 8 categories (Hierarchy, SSOT, Compactness, Requirements, Actuality, Legacy, Stack Adaptation, Semantic Content). Delegates to ln-601 for deep semantic verification of project documents. Use when documentation needs quality review, after major doc updates, or as part of ln-100-documents-pipeline. Outputs Compliance Score X/10 per category + Findings + Recommended Actions.
How to use this skill
Bring this guide into your coding agent with a prompt tailored to the tool you use.
- Open your project in Codex.
- Copy and paste the prompt below.
- Review files and risks before approving any action.
Inspect the Agent Skill at https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/blob/HEAD/skills/quality/ln-600-docs-auditor-levnikolaevich-claude-code-skills-2/SKILL.md and all supporting files. Report provenance, permissions, scripts, dependencies, and security risks. Propose an exact installation into .agents/skills/ln-600-docs-auditor, but wait for my approval before writing files or running scripts.
Copying this prompt does not install or run the skill. Review third-party files before use.
Documentation Auditor
Audit project documentation quality. Universal for any tech stack.
Purpose
- Proactively compress - find all opportunities to reduce size while preserving value
- Eliminate meaningless, redundant, and verbose content
- Convert prose to structured formats (tables, lists)
- Verify documentation hierarchy with CLAUDE.md as root
- Detect duplication and enforce Single Source of Truth
- Ensure docs match current code state
- Semantic verification - delegate to ln-601 to verify content matches SCOPE and codebase reality
Invocation
- Direct: User invokes for documentation quality review
- Pipeline: Called by ln-100-documents-pipeline (Phase 5, if auditDocs=true)
Workflow
- Scan: Find all .md files in project (CLAUDE.md, README.md, docs/**)
- Build Tree: Construct hierarchy from CLAUDE.md outward links
- Audit Categories 1-7: Run structural checks (see Audit Categories below)
- Semantic Audit (Category 8): For each project document, delegate to ln-601-semantic-content-auditor
- Score: Calculate X/10 per category (including semantic scores from ln-601)
- Report: Output findings and recommended actions
Phase 4: Semantic Audit Delegation
For each project document (excluding tasks/, reference/, presentation/):
FOR doc IN [CLAUDE.md, docs/README.md, docs/project/*.md]:
result = DELEGATE ln-601-semantic-content-auditor {
doc_path: doc,
project_root: project_root,
tech_stack: detected_stack
}
semantic_findings.append(result.findings)
semantic_scores[doc] = result.scores
Target documents: CLAUDE.md, docs/README.md, docs/documentation_standards.md, docs/principles.md, docs/project/*.md
Excluded: docs/tasks/, docs/reference/, docs/presentation/, tests/
Audit Categories
| # | Category | What to Check |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hierarchy & Links | CLAUDE.md is root; all docs reachable via links; no orphaned files; no broken links |
| 2 | Single Source of Truth | No content duplication; duplicates replaced with links to source; clear ownership |
| 3 | Proactive Compression | Eliminate verbose/redundant content; prose→tables; remove meaningless info; compress even under-limit files; see size_limits.md |
| 4 | Requirements Compliance | Correct sections; within size limits; no code blocks (tables/ASCII diagrams/text only); stack-appropriate doc links |
| 5 | Actuality (CRITICAL) | Verify facts against code: paths exist, functions match, APIs work, configs valid; outdated docs are worse than none |
| 6 | Legacy Cleanup | No history sections; no "was changed" notes; no deprecated info; current state only |
| 7 | Stack Adaptation | Links/refs match project stack; no Python examples in .NET project; official docs for correct platform |
| 8 | Semantic Content | Delegated to ln-601: Content matches SCOPE; serves project goals; descriptions match actual code behavior; architecture/API docs reflect reality |
Output Format
## Documentation Audit Report - [DATE]
### Compliance Score
| Category | Score | Issues |
|----------|-------|--------|
| Hierarchy & Links | X/10 | N issues found |
| Single Source of Truth | X/10 | N duplications |
| Proactive Compression | X/10 | N compression opportunities |
| Requirements Compliance | X/10 | N violations |
| Actuality | X/10 | N mismatches with code |
| Legacy Cleanup | X/10 | N legacy items |
| Stack Adaptation | X/10 | N stack mismatches |
| Semantic Content | X/10 | N semantic issues (via ln-601) |
| **Overall** | **X/10** | |
### Critical Findings
- [ ] **[Category]** `path/file.md:line` - Issue description. **Action:** Fix suggestion.
### Recommended Actions
| Priority | Action | Location | Category |
|----------|--------|----------|----------|
| High | Remove duplicate section | docs/X.md | SSOT |
| Medium | Add link to CLAUDE.md | docs/Y.md | Hierarchy |
Scoring Algorithm
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_scoring.md for unified scoring formula.
Severity mapping:
| Issue Type | Severity |
|---|---|
| Outdated content (code mismatch) | CRITICAL |
| Broken links, orphaned docs | HIGH |
| Semantic mismatch (via ln-601) | HIGH |
| Content duplication | MEDIUM |
| Missing compression opportunity | LOW |
Reference Files
- Size limits and targets: references/size_limits.md
- Detailed checklist: references/audit_checklist.md
Critical Notes
- Fix content, not rules: NEVER modify standards/rules files (*_standards.md, *_rules.md, *_limits.md) to make violations pass. Always fix the violating files instead.
- Verify facts against code: Actively check every path, function name, API, config mentioned in docs. Run commands. Outdated docs mislead - they're worse than no docs.
- Compress always: Size limits are upper bounds, not targets. A 100-line file instead of 300 is a win. Always look for compression opportunities.
- Meaningless content: Remove filler words, obvious statements, over-explanations. If it doesn't add value, delete it.
- No code in docs: Documents describe algorithms in tables or ASCII diagrams. Code belongs in codebase.
- Forbidden: Code blocks, implementation snippets
- Allowed: Tables, ASCII diagrams, Mermaid, method signatures (1 line)
- Instead of code: "See Official docs" or "See src/file.cs:42"
- Format Priority: Tables/ASCII > Lists (enumerations only) > Text (last resort)
- Stack adaptation: Verify all documentation references match project stack. .NET project must not have Python examples. Check official doc links point to correct platform (Microsoft docs for C#, MDN for JS, etc.)
- Code is truth: When docs contradict code, always update docs. Never "fix" code to match documentation.
- SSOT re-verification after fixes: After making ANY documentation change, re-check that the fix maintains Single Source of Truth. If content exists in multiple files, keep it in the canonical source only and replace other occurrences with a link to that source (e.g.,
See [section](path#anchor)). Never duplicate content inline — always link. Canonical source hierarchy: CLAUDE.md → docs/README.md → docs/project/.md → docs/reference/.md. - Delete, don't archive: Legacy content should be removed, not moved to "archive"
- No history: Documents describe current state only; git tracks history
Version: 4.0.0 Last Updated: 2026-01-28