OpenParable
Skip to content
← Back to skills

Jedpsych Submission

Documents
jedpsych-submission

Jedpsych Submission is an Agent Skill for documents published in the brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills repository on GitHub: a SKILL.md instruction file an AI agent can load to do this task.

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Educational Psychology via Editorial Manager — masked-review anonymization, the 12,000-word format and 250-word abstract, APA 7th-edition style, JARS reporting, and the Transparency and Openness subsection with data/materials/code identifiers. Final checks; it does not draft content.

View on GitHub ↗
QUICK START

How to use this skill

Bring this guide into your coding agent with a prompt tailored to the tool you use.

  1. Open your project in Codex.
  2. Copy and paste the prompt below.
  3. Review files and risks before approving any action.
Prompt to paste
Inspect the Agent Skill at https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/blob/HEAD/Journal-of-Educational-Psychology-Skills/skills/jedpsych-submission/SKILL.md and all supporting files. Report provenance, permissions, scripts, dependencies, and security risks. Propose an exact installation into .agents/skills/jedpsych-submission, but wait for my approval before writing files or running scripts.

Copying this prompt does not install or run the skill. Review third-party files before use.

Submission Preflight (jedpsych-submission)

The last check before submitting through Editorial Manager (editorialmanager.com/edu). The things that most often sink a Journal of Educational Psychology submission are broken masking, busting the word format, and incomplete transparency/JARS reporting. Verify volatile specifics (format numbers, policy wording, current editor, portal) on the official APA page first (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准).

When to trigger

  • "Submitting tomorrow" — last pass before upload
  • Unsure what the format, masking, and transparency requirements demand
  • Confirming the abstract, anonymization, Transparency and Openness subsection, and deposits are in order

Process facts (verify volatile items on the official page)

  • Owner / publisher: American Psychological Association (APA).
  • Portal: Editorial Manager, editorialmanager.com/edu (Word .docx, or LaTeX .tex zip + PDF).
  • Review: masked — both author and reviewer identities are masked.
  • Length: manuscripts generally ≤ 12,000 words (≈ 40 double-spaced pages, 12-pt Times New Roman), excluding references, tables, figures, and appendices.
  • Abstract: ≤ 250 words on a separate page.
  • Style: APA 7th edition (APA Publication Manual, 7th ed.), double-spaced.
  • Transparency: a Transparency and Openness subsection stating data, materials, and analysis-code availability with persistent identifiers (or justified unavailability).
  • Standards: JARS (quantitative/qualitative/mixed) and JARS-REC; preregistration encouraged but not mandatory (disclose status, provide links); Open Science Badges (Open Data, Open Data with Protected Access, Open Materials, Preregistered, Preregistered+Analysis Plan) available with a signed disclosure form.
  • Fee / open access: no submission fee (verified 2026-06-22; "submitting a manuscript for peer review is free of charge"); peer review is free. Any post-acceptance open-access / APC charge is set by APA if you choose OA — confirm the current figure on the APA author pages.
  • Types: primary empirical articles; occasional exceptionally important meta-analyses; single- instrument validation studies are typically out of scope.

Preflight checklist

Format & abstract

  • Body ≤ 12,000 words (excluding references, tables, figures, appendices)
  • Abstract ≤ 250 words on a separate page
  • APA 7th edition, double-spaced, 12-pt Times New Roman; statistics with effect sizes + CIs

Masked review (anonymization)

  • First page omits author names/affiliations; includes title + submission date
  • No identifying grant numbers, IRB/institution/site/district names
  • Self-citations phrased in the third person (not "our prior work")
  • Repository / preregistration links anonymized; file metadata stripped

Transparency & standards

  • Transparency and Openness subsection: data, materials, analysis code availability + DOIs (or justified restriction)
  • Analysis code deposited; reproduces results in a fresh session
  • Preregistration disclosed + linked (if applicable); deviations noted (encouraged, not mandatory)
  • JARS / JARS-REC items complete for the design; participant/context reporting done
  • Badge disclosure form signed (if applying for Open Science Badges)

Design & stats

  • Nesting modeled (multilevel/SEM) where students are nested; cluster-level inference
  • Effect sizes + CIs + educational interpretation for major results
  • Sample-size justification at the right level; full disclosure of exclusions/attrition

Worked micro-example — preflight verdict (illustrative)

Running the cluster-randomized reading trial through the gate the night before upload:

Length:    body 10,840 / 12,000 words (refs/tables/figures excluded) → PASS
Abstract:  236 words; states design (48 classrooms), effect (g = 0.23,
           95% CI [0.06, 0.40]), and the implication → PASS
APA:       7th edition, double-spaced; ES + CI throughout → PASS
Masked:    no names/affiliations; grant# and district name removed; self-
           cites third-person; OSF anonymized-view links; metadata stripped → PASS
Transparency: data (de-identified) + materials + code each have a DOI;
           restricted raw data has an access path; subsection present → PASS
Standards: JARS quantitative + JARS-REC items complete; prereg linked → PASS
Stats:     two-level model, ICC reported, mediation; cluster-level power → PASS
Verdict:   ready to upload to Editorial Manager.

Last-mile failure modes that trigger a return

FailureCaught byQuick fix
Body 13,500 wordslength checkmove secondary material to online supplement; tighten
Abstract 280 wordsabstract checkcut to ≤ 250; keep design + effect + implication
Grant number / district name visiblemasking checkremove all identifying cues before upload
"Our previous study showed…"masking checkrephrase self-citations in the third person
"Data available on request"transparency checkdeposit with a DOI or document an access path
Clustered data, single-level modelrigor checkrefit multilevel; report ICC (route to jedpsych-data-analysis)

Volatile specifics (exact word/abstract limits, portal, current editor, badge wording) change. Re-confirm every number above against the journal's current submission guidelines before relying on it.

Anti-patterns

  • Submitting over the 12,000-word body limit or with a 250+ word abstract
  • Identity leaks (names, grant numbers, sites, first-person self-cites) under masked review
  • Missing or empty Transparency and Openness subsection
  • Incomplete JARS / JARS-REC reporting
  • Clustered data not modeled with multilevel/SEM methods

Output format

【Length】body ≤ 12,000 words (excl. refs/tables/figures/appendices)? [Y/N]
【Abstract】≤ 250 words + design + effect + implication? [Y/N]
【APA 7th + double-spaced】[Y/N]
【Masked】names/affiliations/grant#/site/IRB/self-cites/links/metadata? [Y/N]
【Transparency】data + materials + code + DOIs + subsection? [Y/N]
【Standards】JARS / JARS-REC complete; preregistration disclosed? [Y/N]
【Design/stats】nesting modeled; effect sizes + CIs + interpretation? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → jedpsych-rebuttal on R&R

Supplementary resources