Issta Submission
Documentsissta-submissionIssta Submission is an Agent Skill for documents published in the brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills repository on GitHub: a SKILL.md instruction file an AI agent can load to do this task.
Use when auditing an ISSTA submission for HotCRP readiness, the 18-page (excluding references) limit, ACM sigconf plus review and anonymous formatting, double-anonymous integrity, the January deadline, artifact intent, track choice among research/experience/replicability, and desk-reject triggers before the phase-one upload.
QUICK START
How to use this skill
Bring this guide into your coding agent with a prompt tailored to the tool you use.
- Open your project in Codex.
- Copy and paste the prompt below.
- Review files and risks before approving any action.
Prompt to paste
Inspect the Agent Skill at https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/blob/HEAD/ISSTA-Skills/skills/issta-submission/SKILL.md and all supporting files. Report provenance, permissions, scripts, dependencies, and security risks. Propose an exact installation into .agents/skills/issta-submission, but wait for my approval before writing files or running scripts.
Copying this prompt does not install or run the skill. Review third-party files before use.
ISSTA Submission
Use this for an ISSTA research-paper submission audit. Reopen the current Research Papers call,
the important-dates page, the ACM sigconf template, and the HotCRP site before giving
deadline-ready advice — ISSTA's submission model changes between editions and is the first thing
to re-verify.
Submission audit
- Confirm the target is the ISSTA research track, not a co-located workshop, the Doctoral Symposium, or a sibling venue. ISSTA 2026 also invited Experience Papers and Replicability Studies — pick the track that matches the contribution's evidence, not its topic alone.
- Build the HotCRP record early: title, abstract, authors, conflicts, and topic tags. Register the paper before the deadline even if the PDF is still moving; a late HotCRP creation cannot be undone.
- Apply the ACM
sigconftemplate with thereview(line numbers) andanonymousoptions. Do not shrink margins, fonts, or spacing to fit — format tampering is a named desk-reject trigger. - Fit the 18-page limit that excludes references only. In 2026 every section, figure, table, and appendix counted against the 18; there is no separate unlimited appendix, so decision-critical content lives in the body or in the artifact, not in overflow pages.
- Enforce double-anonymous review: no author names or affiliations, third-person self-citations, anonymized or withheld repository links, and no identifying PDF metadata.
- Decide the artifact plan now. The artifact-evaluation track is separate and later, but the paper should already promise what it will archive, and the review-time copy must be anonymous.
Blocking risks
- Late HotCRP registration or PDF upload against the phase-one deadline.
- Over the 18-page limit, or
sigconfformat modified. - Identity leak in text, self-citation phrasing, repository link, or PDF metadata.
- Wrong track (a replicability study filed as a research paper, or vice versa).
- Evaluation too thin to survive the soundness and evaluation criteria — a review-stage loss even when nothing is technically desk-rejectable.
Desk-reject and triage table
| Trigger | Severity at ISSTA | Repair window |
|---|---|---|
| Over 18 pages (excluding references) | Desk reject | None after the deadline |
sigconf format tampering | Desk reject | None |
| Author identity leak in PDF or metadata | Desk reject | None |
Missing review/anonymous options | Chair flag | Only before the deadline |
| Evaluation without real subjects or a baseline | Review-stage loss | Fixable only before submission |
Final-week sequence for a testing/analysis paper
- Freeze the technique's scope and threat model; reviewers grade claims against the scope you set.
- Regenerate every results table from logged runs so the PDF and the artifact cannot diverge.
- Pin subjects and benchmark versions (Defects4J revision, subject SHAs) in the paper and artifact.
- Run the anonymity sweep: PDF metadata,
\authorblock, acknowledgements, repository owner strings. - Confirm the HotCRP abstract matches the PDF abstract and the topic tags match the reviewer pool.
Format anchors
- ISSTA uses ACM
sigconf, a two-column layout; wide code listings, algorithm blocks, and multi-column result tables overflow easily, so compress or use full-width spans early rather than on deadline night. - The 18-page figure describes the 2026 cycle; older editions used 10 pages plus 2 for references. Treat every number as provisional and reopen the current call before relying on it.
Output format
[ISSTA readiness] Ready / Needs fixes / Not ready
[Track] research / experience / replicability
[Blocking checks] <HotCRP/page/format/anonymity/artifact-intent>
[Evaluation risk] <one soundness or evaluation gap>
[Desk-reject risk] <one issue>
[Fix order] <ordered fixes before the phase-one deadline>