OpenParable
Skip to content
← Back to skills

Hrm Submission

Documents
hrm-submission

Hrm Submission is an Agent Skill for documents published in the brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills repository on GitHub: a SKILL.md instruction file an AI agent can load to do this task.

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Human Resource Management (Wiley "HRM") manuscript via Wiley ScholarOne — double-blind anonymization, the title-page split, APA style, the data-availability statement, ORCID, and the dual-contribution check the EIC screens on. Final checks; it does not draft content.

View on GitHub ↗
QUICK START

How to use this skill

Bring this guide into your coding agent with a prompt tailored to the tool you use.

  1. Open your project in Codex.
  2. Copy and paste the prompt below.
  3. Review files and risks before approving any action.
Prompt to paste
Inspect the Agent Skill at https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/blob/HEAD/Human-Resource-Management-Skills/skills/hrm-submission/SKILL.md and all supporting files. Report provenance, permissions, scripts, dependencies, and security risks. Propose an exact installation into .agents/skills/hrm-submission, but wait for my approval before writing files or running scripts.

Copying this prompt does not install or run the skill. Review third-party files before use.

Submission Preflight (hrm-submission)

When to trigger

  • "Submitting tomorrow" — last check before pressing submit on ScholarOne
  • Unsure how to anonymize for double-blind review and what goes on the separate title page
  • Confirming APA style, the data-availability statement, and ORCID are in order
  • Making sure the manuscript will clear the EIC's fit-and-relevance screen, not just the rules

Process facts (source map refreshed 2026-06; re-confirm on the official Wiley author page)

  • Human Resource Management is a Wiley journal (Online ISSN 1099-050X; Print ISSN 0090-4848). Submission is via Wiley ScholarOne / Manuscript Central (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
  • Double-blind review: the manuscript must be anonymized (no author names, affiliations, self-identifying citations, or acknowledgments in the main file); author details go on a separate title page uploaded as a distinct file (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
  • Editorial screen: the Editor-in-Chief determines whether a paper meets the quality and relevance bar before it is sent to review — papers without a clear scholarly advance and a practical implication are desk-rejected.
  • References: APA style (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
  • Data sharing: Wiley's data-availability policy applies; include an appropriate data-availability statement (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
  • Editorial team: Co-Editors-in-Chief Fang Lee Cooke (Monash) and Shaun Pichler (Cal State Fullerton; co-EiC from Jan 2025) (verified 2026-06-22 via Wiley; re-verify before submission as the board rotates).
  • Exact word/abstract limits, article-type list, ORCID requirement, and any APC / open-access options are 待核实 — confirm on the live author-guidelines page before submitting.

Preflight checklist

Anonymization & files (double-blind)

  • Main manuscript fully anonymized: no names, affiliations, funding/acknowledgments, or revealing self-citations ("as we showed (Author, 2021)")
  • Separate title page file with all authors, affiliations, ORCIDs, corresponding-author contact
  • File names and document properties do not leak author identity
  • Tables, figures, and any online supplement embedded/uploaded per ScholarOne rules

Style & structure

  • APA references and in-text citations throughout; reference list complete and consistent
  • Abstract within the journal's limit (待核实) and stating the dual contribution
  • Theoretical-model figure matches the hypotheses; exhibits self-contained
  • Level of analysis and constructs labeled consistently
  • Word/page limit respected (待核实); heavy material moved to an online supplement if needed

Declarations & policy

  • Data-availability statement prepared per Wiley policy
  • Ethics / IRB approval and informed-consent statements where human-subjects data are used
  • Conflict-of-interest and funding disclosures complete
  • Confirmed the paper is not under review elsewhere; AI not listed as an author

The screen check (do this last)

  • A reader of the abstract + intro can see both the scholarly advance and the workforce-policy / HRM-practice implication — this is what the EIC gates on

Anti-patterns

  • Submitting a main file that still names the authors or affiliations (breaks double-blind)
  • Treating the title page as part of the anonymized manuscript
  • Non-APA references, or inconsistent in-text citation style
  • Omitting the data-availability statement
  • Submitting to HRM via the wrong portal/journal (confusing it with HRMJ, the UK journal)
  • Ignoring the practice payoff and hoping the rigor alone clears the EIC screen

Output format

【Anonymization】main file clean + separate title page? [Y/N]
【Style】APA references + house style? [Y/N]
【Abstract/limits】within limit (待核实) + dual contribution stated? [Y/N]
【Data policy】availability statement prepared? [Y/N]
【Declarations】ethics / COI / funding complete? [Y/N]
【Screen check】scholarly advance AND practice payoff visible up front? [Y/N]
【Portal】Wiley ScholarOne (not HRMJ)? [Y/N]
【Next step】submit via ScholarOne → hrm-review-process for what to expect

Supplementary resources