Beamer Presentation Guide
Documentsbeamer-presentation-guideBeamer Presentation Guide is an Agent Skill for documents published in the brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills repository on GitHub: a SKILL.md instruction file an AI agent can load to do this task.
Guide to creating academic presentations with LaTeX Beamer
QUICK START
How to use this skill
Bring this guide into your coding agent with a prompt tailored to the tool you use.
- Open your project in Codex.
- Copy and paste the prompt below.
- Review files and risks before approving any action.
Prompt to paste
Inspect the Agent Skill at https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills/blob/HEAD/skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/writing/templates/beamer-presentation-guide/SKILL.md and all supporting files. Report provenance, permissions, scripts, dependencies, and security risks. Propose an exact installation into .agents/skills/beamer-presentation-guide, but wait for my approval before writing files or running scripts.
Copying this prompt does not install or run the skill. Review third-party files before use.
Beamer Presentation Guide
Create professional academic presentations using LaTeX Beamer with themes, animations, and best practices for conference talks and research seminars.
Basic Beamer Document
\documentclass[aspectratio=169]{beamer} % 16:9 aspect ratio
% Other options: aspectratio=43 (4:3, default), aspectratio=1610
\usetheme{Madrid} % Visual theme
\usecolortheme{default} % Color scheme
\usefonttheme{professionalfonts}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{booktabs} % Better tables
\usepackage{hyperref}
\title[Short Title]{Full Title of Your Presentation}
\subtitle{Conference Name 2025}
\author[A. Smith]{Alice Smith\inst{1} \and Bob Jones\inst{2}}
\institute[MIT, Stanford]{
\inst{1}MIT \and \inst{2}Stanford University
}
\date{March 15, 2025}
\begin{document}
\begin{frame}
\titlepage
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{Outline}
\tableofcontents
\end{frame}
\section{Introduction}
\begin{frame}{Motivation}
\begin{itemize}
\item Research question and why it matters
\item Key challenge in the field
\item Our contribution in one sentence
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
\end{document}
Popular Beamer Themes
| Theme | Style | Best For |
|---|---|---|
Madrid | Professional, structured headers | Conference talks |
Metropolis (mtheme) | Modern, minimal, flat design | CS/tech conferences |
CambridgeUS | Traditional academic | University seminars |
Singapore | Clean navigation sidebar | Long presentations |
Bergen | Compact, information-dense | Technical deep dives |
default | Plain, no decoration | Maximum content area |
Installing Metropolis (Recommended)
% Metropolis is a modern, clean theme widely used in CS/ML talks
\documentclass[aspectratio=169]{beamer}
\usetheme{metropolis}
% Customize colors
\definecolor{customPrimary}{RGB}{0, 83, 159} % University blue
\setbeamercolor{frametitle}{bg=customPrimary}
\setbeamercolor{progress bar}{fg=customPrimary}
% Optional: use Fira Sans font (matches Metropolis design)
% \usepackage[sfdefault]{FiraSans}
Slide Types and Templates
Title + Content Slide
\begin{frame}{Main Result}
\begin{theorem}[Our Main Theorem]
For any $\epsilon > 0$, Algorithm~\ref{alg:ours} achieves an
approximation ratio of $(1 - \epsilon)$ in time $O(n \log n / \epsilon)$.
\end{theorem}
\vspace{0.5em}
Key implications:
\begin{enumerate}
\item First polynomial-time approximation scheme for this problem
\item Improves over Smith et al. (2023) by a factor of $O(\log n)$
\item Extends to weighted variants
\end{enumerate}
\end{frame}
Two-Column Slide
\begin{frame}{Method Overview}
\begin{columns}[T]
\begin{column}{0.48\textwidth}
\textbf{Architecture}
\begin{itemize}
\item Encoder: 6-layer Transformer
\item Decoder: 6-layer Transformer
\item Hidden dim: 512
\item Attention heads: 8
\end{itemize}
\end{column}
\begin{column}{0.48\textwidth}
\textbf{Training}
\begin{itemize}
\item Optimizer: AdamW
\item Learning rate: $3 \times 10^{-4}$
\item Batch size: 256
\item Epochs: 100
\end{itemize}
\end{column}
\end{columns}
\end{frame}
Figure Slide
\begin{frame}{Experimental Results}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.85\textwidth]{figures/results-comparison.pdf}
\caption{Our method (blue) outperforms baselines across all benchmarks.}
\end{figure}
\end{frame}
Table Slide
\begin{frame}{Comparison with State of the Art}
\centering
\small
\begin{tabular}{lcccc}
\toprule
Method & Accuracy & F1 & Params & Speed \\
\midrule
Baseline A & 85.2 & 83.1 & 110M & 1.0x \\
Baseline B & 87.5 & 85.8 & 340M & 0.3x \\
\textbf{Ours} & \textbf{89.1} & \textbf{87.4} & 125M & 0.9x \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{frame}
Animations and Overlays
Progressive Reveal
\begin{frame}{Key Contributions}
\begin{itemize}
\item<1-> First contribution: novel problem formulation
\item<2-> Second contribution: efficient algorithm
\item<3-> Third contribution: theoretical guarantees
\item<4-> Fourth contribution: extensive experiments
\end{itemize}
\only<4>{
\vspace{1em}
\alert{All code and data are publicly available.}
}
\end{frame}
Highlighting
\begin{frame}{Pipeline}
Step 1: Data collection
\begin{itemize}
\item \alert<2>{Crawl 10M web pages}
\item \alert<3>{Filter and deduplicate}
\item \alert<4>{Annotate with human labels}
\end{itemize}
\uncover<5->{
\begin{block}{Result}
Final dataset: 2.3M high-quality labeled examples.
\end{block}
}
\end{frame}
Code Listings in Beamer
\usepackage{listings}
\lstset{
basicstyle=\ttfamily\scriptsize,
keywordstyle=\color{blue}\bfseries,
commentstyle=\color{gray},
stringstyle=\color{red},
breaklines=true,
frame=single,
backgroundcolor=\color{gray!10}
}
\begin{frame}[fragile]{Implementation} % [fragile] required for listings
\begin{lstlisting}[language=Python]
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
class TransformerBlock(nn.Module):
def __init__(self, d_model, n_heads):
super().__init__()
self.attn = nn.MultiheadAttention(d_model, n_heads)
self.norm = nn.LayerNorm(d_model)
def forward(self, x):
return self.norm(x + self.attn(x, x, x)[0])
\end{lstlisting}
\end{frame}
Presentation Tips for Academic Talks
Content Planning
| Talk Length | Slides | Content |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min (lightning) | 5-7 | Problem, method, key result |
| 15 min (conference) | 12-18 | + motivation, related work brief, 2-3 results |
| 30 min (seminar) | 20-30 | + background, methods detail, analysis |
| 60 min (colloquium) | 35-50 | + extensive background, all results, future work |
Design Principles
- One idea per slide: If you need to explain two things, use two slides
- Minimize text: Use bullet points (max 5-6 per slide), not paragraphs
- Large fonts: Body text at least 20pt; never below 16pt
- High-contrast figures: Ensure readability on projectors (avoid light colors on white)
- Consistent style: Same fonts, colors, and layout throughout
- Backup slides: Put extra details, proofs, and additional results after
\appendixfor Q&A
% Backup slides (not counted in slide numbers)
\appendix
\begin{frame}{Proof of Theorem 1}
...
\end{frame}