OpenParable
Skip to content
← Back to skills

AC-24(2)_no-user-or-process-identity

DevOps & Security

AC-24(2)_no-user-or-process-identity is an Agent Skill for devops & security published in the CyberStrikeus/CyberStrike repository on GitHub: a SKILL.md instruction file an AI agent can load to do this task.

Enforce access control decisions based on [organization-defined] that do not include the identity of the user or process acting on behalf of the user.

View on GitHub ↗
QUICK START

How to use this skill

Bring this guide into your coding agent with a prompt tailored to the tool you use.

  1. Open your project in Codex.
  2. Copy and paste the prompt below.
  3. Review files and risks before approving any action.
Prompt to paste
Inspect the Agent Skill at https://github.com/CyberStrikeus/CyberStrike/blob/HEAD/.cyberstrike/skill/NIST/SP800-53_rev5/AC_access-control/AC-24(2)_no-user-or-process-identity/SKILL.md and all supporting files. Report provenance, permissions, scripts, dependencies, and security risks. Propose an exact installation into .agents/skills/ac-24-2-no-user-or-process-identity, but wait for my approval before writing files or running scripts.

Copying this prompt does not install or run the skill. Review third-party files before use.

AC-24(2) No User or Process Identity

Enhancement of: AC-24

High-Level Description

Family: Access Control (AC) Framework: NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5

In certain situations, it is important that access control decisions can be made without information regarding the identity of the users issuing the requests. These are generally instances where preserving individual privacy is of paramount importance. In other situations, user identification information is simply not needed for access control decisions, and especially in the case of distributed systems, transmitting such information with the needed degree of assurance may be very expensive or difficult to accomplish. MAC, RBAC, ABAC, and label-based control policies, for example, might not include user identity as an attribute.

What to Check

  • Verify AC-24(2) No User or Process Identity is documented in SSP
  • Confirm control is operating effectively
  • Review evidence of continuous monitoring for AC-24(2)
  • Verify enhancement builds upon base control AC-24

How to Test

Step 1: Review Documentation

Examine the System Security Plan (SSP) and related artifacts for AC-24(2) implementation details. Verify the organization has documented how this control is satisfied.

Step 2: Validate Implementation

# For cloud environments, use cloud-audit-mcp tools
# For on-premises, review system configurations directly

# Example: Check if account management policies exist
grep -r "account.management\|access.control" /etc/security/ 2>/dev/null

Step 3: Test Operating Effectiveness

Verify the control is actively functioning, not just documented. Check logs, configurations, and operational evidence.

Tools

ToolPurposeUsage
cloud-audit-mcpCheck IAM policies and access controlscloud_audit_iam_policies
hackbrowser-mcpTest web application access controlsbrowser_auth_test

Remediation Guide

Control Statement

Enforce access control decisions based on [organization-defined] that do not include the identity of the user or process acting on behalf of the user.

Implementation Guidance

In certain situations, it is important that access control decisions can be made without information regarding the identity of the users issuing the requests. These are generally instances where preserving individual privacy is of paramount importance. In other situations, user identification information is simply not needed for access control decisions, and especially in the case of distributed systems, transmitting such information with the needed degree of assurance may be very expensive or difficult to accomplish. MAC, RBAC, ABAC, and label-based control policies, for example, might not include user identity as an attribute.

Risk Assessment

FindingSeverityImpact
AC-24(2) No User or Process Identity not implementedHighAccess Control
AC-24(2) partially implementedMediumIncomplete Access Control

CWE Categories

CWE IDTitle
CWE-284Improper Access Control

References

Checklist

  • Control documented in SSP
  • Implementation evidence collected
  • Operating effectiveness validated
  • Continuous monitoring in place
  • Related controls (none) reviewed