Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
Use when writing a SenSys Response to Reviewers for a resubmission — treating the reviews as a required-changes contract, mapping each blocking concern to a specific change and the new measurement that closes it, staging the energy and testbed experiments a systems revision demands, and keeping the response anonymous and in the CFP's form.
Use when sharpening the core methodological claim of a Sociological Methods & Research (SMR) paper — the new estimator/design/diagnostic and exactly what it fixes versus existing methods. Frames and bounds the contribution; does not derive its properties or run simulations.
Use when responding to a Sociological Methods & Research (SMR) decision letter — drafting the point-by-point response and revision plan for properties, simulations, the empirical illustration, software, and exposition under SMR's verbatim-comment response format. Plans the response; does not run new analyses itself.
Use when drafting an ACM SoCC author response (rebuttal) during a round's response window, covering the single written turn, answering both the systems and the data/measurement reviewer, supplying the tail-latency and cost numbers reviewers ask for, staying within dual anonymity, and the fact that SoCC has no Major-Revision round to fall back on.
Use when articulating the theoretical contribution of a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript — naming the new way of seeing it provides and differentiating it from prior theory. Frames the contribution; it does NOT build the theory (soctheory-theory-construction) or audit its reasoning (soctheory-argument-development).
Use when building the actual theory for a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript — turning a positioned problem into defined concepts, explicit mechanisms, internally consistent propositions, and scope conditions. Constructs the theory; it does NOT stress-test the argument's validity against rivals (soctheory-argument-development) or set the domain limits (soctheory-boundary-conditions).
Use when targeting 《南方经济》(South China Journal of Economics — 广东省社会科学院/广东经济学会主办的经济学月刊, 匿名审稿、不收版面费) or deciding whether a Chinese econ manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, anonymous-review/fee-free policy, abstract/keyword house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when targeting 《体育与科学》(Sports & Science, Jiangsu) — a CSSCI sport-science journal distinctive for reflective, interdisciplinary, theory-forward and methodologically self-aware scholarship (academic dialogues, critical essays, problem-and-method debates) in sport humanities & social science. Best for conceptual/critical contributions that advance how the field thinks; route empirical exercise science, applied competitive work, and standard survey社科 to the appropriate specialist venues.
Use when preparing the data, materials, and transparency posture for a Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ) manuscript. SPQ ENCOURAGES sharing data, code, and materials but does NOT require it, and willingness to share has no impact on acceptance; the journal follows the ASA data-sharing norm and Code of Ethics. Covers quantitative and qualitative/interpretive transparency and confidentiality. Prepares the posture; it does not invent requirements.
Use when responding to external-review (外审) comments from 《中国社会科学》 (Social Sciences in China) — drafting a point-by-point response letter that defends or strengthens the original proposition, deepens theory and cross-disciplinary dialogue, and revises the manuscript before writing replies. Use after revising the text, not before.