Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
Use when targeting The BMJ or deciding whether a clinical medicine or evidence-based medicine manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when targeting The Econometrics Journal (EctJ) or deciding whether an econometrics manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when targeting The Innovation or deciding whether a cross-disciplinary breakthrough manuscript fits this Cell Press-partnered broad-science journal. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when targeting The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism or deciding whether an aesthetics manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, its philosophical-argument bar, objection-handling and arts-criticism expectations, house style and review norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when targeting The Journal of Philosophy or deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit as a top generalist venue for agenda-setting articles, the argument-rigor and broad-significance bar, dialectical-engagement expectations, house style and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when targeting The Plant Journal or deciding whether a plant-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the mechanistic gene-to-function and molecular-rigor bar, evidence and data-deposition expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when targeting The Web Conference (WWW) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for web and AI.
Use when targeting Trends in Food Science & Technology or deciding whether a food-science review manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's review-only fit, the critical-synthesis and comprehensiveness bar, structure expectations, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when drafting UAI author responses during the OpenReview rebuttal window, turning reviewer objections about technical correctness, novelty, evidential backing, or clarity into anonymous, evidence-anchored replies that survive the reviewer-and-area-chair discussion phase that follows immediately after authors go quiet.
Use when revising a UAI manuscript for probabilistic-inference readers, enforcing precise notation for distributions, graphs, and interventions, explicit assumption and identifiability statements, an 8-page main part that carries the whole argument while proofs sit in the appendix, and claims calibrated to what the theory and experiments show.