Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
Use when positioning the contribution against the literature for a Journal of Management Studies (JMS) manuscript — locating the paper in a named theoretical conversation and showing what it adds. Stakes the contribution; it does not build the mechanism (jms-theory-development) or write the closing contribution paragraph (jms-contribution-framing).
Use when drafting the response-to-reviewers and revision for a Journal of Management Studies (JMS) R&R — turning a developmental, often multi-round decision letter into a point-by-point response that satisfies the handling editor. Drafts the rebuttal; it does not re-plan the review reading (jms-review-process) or rebuild the theory from scratch (jms-theory-development).
Use when the theoretical argument is the bottleneck for a Journal of Management Studies (JMS) manuscript — building a mechanism and deriving hypotheses a priori, OR abstracting grounded constructs and propositions from qualitative data. Constructs the theory both deductively and inductively; it does not run the analysis (jms-data-analysis) or write the final contribution paragraph (jms-contribution-framing).
Use when prose and structure are the bottleneck for a Journal of Management Studies (JMS) manuscript — landing the abstract and intro, sustaining a theory-forward narrative, and meeting house conventions (Harvard refs, UK/US English, 200-word abstract). Polishes the writing; it does not invent the contribution (jms-contribution-framing) or run the analysis.
Use when judging whether a manuscript fits 《管理科学学报》 (Journal of Management Sciences in China) — a 数理/定量 (mathematical / quantitative) management-science journal whose deliverable is a model plus provable properties plus an algorithm. Use when the draft is regression coefficients + policy talk, or survey-SEM, to detect OFF-FIT and re-route to 管理世界 / 南开管理评论 / 金融研究. Use before drafting and whenever a reviewer asks whether the contribution is in method or in conclusion.
Use when unifying notation and tightening mathematical exposition for a 《管理科学学报》 (Journal of Management Sciences in China) manuscript — one symbol one meaning, explicit assumptions, rigorous statements in the body, and full proofs moved to the appendix to keep the body readable. Use as a late-stage statute pass before submission.
Use when writing the response letter for an R&R at 《管理科学学报》 (Journal of Management Sciences in China) — addressing reviewer concerns about assumptions, proof gaps, algorithm analysis, numerical design, and model contribution, with point-by-point responses and exact pointers to revised propositions / appendix. Use only after the manuscript itself is revised.
Use when positioning a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) manuscript against the I-O literature so the theoretical contribution is unmistakable. JAP expects the gap and the advance stated against the closest prior work — and a clear distinction from sibling venues (Personnel Psychology, AMJ, OBHDP, JOB). Stakes the contribution; it does not write the literature review.
Use when writing the response to a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) revise-and-resubmit. JAP R&Rs typically demand stronger theory, added rigor (alternative models, CMV checks, robustness), and fuller transparency across multiple reviewers and an action editor. The response must address every point, strengthen the contribution, and keep masking intact. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate results.
Use when you need to understand how the Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) evaluates a manuscript — masked (anonymized) peer review, the action-editor model, the dual gate of theoretical contribution and measurement/design rigor, and common desk-reject patterns. Use when stress-testing a paper before submission or interpreting a decision letter. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.