Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
Use when anticipating the objections a law-and-economics referee at The Journal of Law and Economics (JLE) will raise, so a manuscript pre-empts them before submission or addresses them in revision. Plans the defense around JLE's single-blind process; it does not draft the response letter (jle-rebuttal) or run the submission preflight (jle-submission).
Use when revising the prose, abstract, and introduction of a The Journal of Law and Economics (JLE) manuscript so the legal institution and the design land early, in University of Chicago Press house style with Chicago author-date citations. Polishes exposition; it does not change the result (jle-identification / jle-robustness) or the exhibits.
Use when staking a Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO) manuscript's contribution against the new-institutional / positive-political-economy frontier — locating it relative to Williamson/North/Weingast and to sibling journals. Sharpens the contribution claim; it does not write the literature review prose.
Use when anticipating the referee read on a Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO) manuscript before submitting — modeling the institutional/organizational economist who will review it and pre-empting the objections that sink JLEO papers. Anticipates objections; it does not write the response to an actual report (jleo-rebuttal).
Use when scoping or pitching a topic for a Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO) manuscript — testing whether the question is a genuine law-economics-organization / positive-political-economy contribution rather than a sibling-journal fit. Sharpens the question and its audience; it does not design identification or build the model.
Use when the prose, introduction, or abstract of a Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO) manuscript needs to land its institutional/organizational contribution for an OUP economics-of-institutions audience. Sharpens framing and exposition; it does not change the analysis or the model.
Use when positioning a Journal of Marketing (JM) manuscript in the literature — joining a substantive marketing conversation and defending against the "new-context replication" rejection. Positions the paper; it does not build the mechanism (jm-theory-development) or write the contribution statement (jm-contribution-framing).
Use when planning a revision and drafting the point-by-point response letter for a Journal of Marketing (JM) R&R — prioritizing the Coeditor's decisive concerns, strengthening substantive novelty and managerial relevance, and keeping the double-anonymized rules. Plans and drafts the response; it does not interpret the original decision (jm-review-process).
Use when building the conceptual logic for a Journal of Marketing (JM) manuscript — grounding theory in a real-world marketing phenomenon, deriving predictions, and accommodating an empirics-first route. Builds the argument; it does not select the question (jm-topic-selection) or run the analysis (jm-data-analysis).
Use when choosing or sharpening a research question for the Journal of Marketing (JM) — testing whether it is substantive, managerially/societally relevant, and JM-fit (vs. JMR, Marketing Science, or JCR). Locks the question; it does not build the conceptual logic (jm-theory-development) or frame the contribution (jm-contribution-framing).