Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
Use when an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) manuscript's prose must land for its dual academic/policy audience — a tight intro, an italicized abstract with JEL codes, Chicago style, and a clear policy "so what." Sharpens the writing; it does not build the exhibits (imfer-tables-figures) or run the submission preflight (imfer-submission).
Use when handling the IEEE INFOCOM post-submission reality — that the venue has traditionally offered no author rebuttal — covering how to write a self-defending submission, how to read and act on an early-reject, what to do after a final reject, and how to use any response window a given cycle does introduce (verify per cycle).
Use when revising an IEEE INFOCOM paper for a networking problem and system model stated up front, theorems or protocol design that pay off, evaluation proportional to the claim, defensive writing that pre-empts objections (because there is no rebuttal), double-blind wording, and disciplined use of the tight IEEEtran two-column page budget.
Use when targeting 《经济问题探索》(Inquiry into Economic Issues — 云南省发展和改革委员会主管、云南省宏观经济研究院（云南省产业研究院）主办的经济类月刊, 1980 创刊, 匿名审稿) or deciding whether a Chinese econ/management manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when targeting International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for 3D vision.
Use when targeting International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for software engineering flagship.
Use when targeting International Natural Language Generation Conference (INLG) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for language generation.
Use when INTERSPEECH reviews arrive on CMT and a rebuttal is due — triaging three-or-more speech reviewers with mixed science/engineering instincts, answering WER/MOS evidence doubts with material already in the 4-page record, keeping replies anonymous, and writing for the meta-reviewer who decides in June.
Use when hardening the reproducibility of an INTERSPEECH paper — pinning corpus versions and official splits, publishing text-normalization and scoring rules that WER/EER silently depend on, documenting MOS listening-test protocols, reporting seeds and variance within 4 pages, and making toolkit recipes rerunnable.
Use when writing or compressing an INTERSPEECH paper into its 4 content pages — the abstract-and-index-terms opening, task-first framing for a mixed science/engineering readership, table and figure economy, protocol one-liners that preserve rigor under compression, and the cuts that shrink pages without shrinking claims.