Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
Use when writing the related-work and positioning of an ACM CoNEXT paper — covering the networking literature lanes (SIGCOMM, NSDI, IMC, SIGMETRICS, MobiCom, CCR), delta-first positioning against the venue's own recent programs, and keeping self-citations double-anonymous.
Use when deciding what goes in the ACM CoNEXT main body versus the appendix budget versus the artifact — splitting content by decision-criticality so nothing a reviewer needs to accept the paper hides in an appendix or repository, within the acmart limits (long ≤4 appendix pages, short ≤2).
Use when shaping the prose and structure of an ACM CoNEXT paper — leading with the networking problem and deployment context, tying every claim to a measurement on the real target platform, arguing limitations rather than reciting them, and holding the acmart page budget for long (≤16) and short (≤10) papers.
Use when targeting Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for NLP learning.
Use when targeting Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning (CHIL) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for AI for health.
Use when targeting Conference on Machine Learning and Systems (MLSys) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for ML systems.
Use when targeting Coordination Chemistry Reviews (CCR) or deciding whether a review fits this Elsevier venue for coordination, inorganic, and organometallic chemistry. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when writing or revising a CoRL paper's prose — leading with the embodied task and the learned component, calibrating claims to evaluation scale, writing the mandatory Limitations section as a scored asset, fitting the argument into 8 pages, and satisfying a dual reviewer audience of ML and robotics readers.
Use when drafting or revising the 中文摘要 or 英文 abstract for a 《中国行政管理》(Chinese Public Administration, CPA) manuscript — the journal run by the Chinese Public Administration Society. 当摘要写成"具有重要意义"套话、看不出研究问题方法发现、或中英文不对齐时使用。Enforces the question→method→finding→significance four-part pattern, forbids empty-significance phrases, and keeps the abstract anchored in a public-administration theory frame.
Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a 《中国行政管理》 manuscript, when the public-administration theory anchor is missing, or when the Chinese-governance / international-PA reference balance is off.