Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
Use after Cell reviews arrive to triage the decision, prioritize the (often substantial) new experiments by impact × feasibility, and draft a point-by-point response that is respectful, evidence-led, and closes the "completeness" gaps reviewers demand. Do not run before the experiments and revision are actually done.
Use when targeting Cell Reports Medicine (Cell Rep Med) or deciding whether a translational or clinical manuscript with mechanistic depth fits this open-access Cell Press venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use as the final preflight before submitting to Cell — a complete checklist across significance, narrative, Highlights/eTOC/Graphical Abstract, Summary, figures, STAR Methods, data, references, and required files. Bundles the checklist and cover-letter templates.
Use to write Cell's Summary — a single unstructured paragraph of ≤ ~150 words that conveys the complete story, the mechanism, and the broad significance, quantified and readable by a general life-scientist. Late-stage polish.
Use to structure a Cell Article and hold its length — Summary, Introduction, Results, Discussion, STAR Methods, figure legends, references — with main-text length and display-item budgets, and Results subheadings driving the single arc.
Use when writing or polishing the English abstract and contribution statement for a 《经济学(季刊)》 (China Economic Quarterly, CEQ) manuscript — producing a tight English abstract (≤ ~100 words per the journal's guideline) that reads to a field economist and benchmarks the contribution against specific papers. Use at the polish stage, after identification and results are final.
Use to judge whether a manuscript is on-target for 《经济学(季刊)》 (China Economic Quarterly, CEQ) before investing in revision — CEQ is the strictest Chinese econ journal on identification and the most internationally legible. If the fit is weak, re-route to economic-research / china-industrial-economics / journal-of-financial-research / journal-of-world-economy.
Use when drafting the response letter for a revise-and-resubmit (R&R) at 《经济学(季刊)》 (China Economic Quarterly, CEQ) — where reviewers are typically field-trained and press hardest on identification, modern-DID compliance, and inference. Structures a point-by-point reply that concedes or rebuts with evidence. Use only after the manuscript itself has been revised.
Use when drafting or revising the 中文摘要 or 英文 abstract for a 《财经研究》 (Journal of Finance and Economics) manuscript. 使用时机：摘要写成"提供了新视角"式套话、五句要素（中国现实问题、数据与识别、量化发现、机制异质性、贡献启示）缺句、中英文摘要语义不对齐、或投稿前发现摘要未出现核心数据与识别策略时。Enforces the five-sentence pattern, 逐句打磨对照, 关键词配套, and the empty-significance blacklist.
Use when designing or writing heterogeneity analysis for a Journal-of-Finance-and-Economics manuscript. Enforces five-dimension priority and theoretical-justification discipline.