Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
当你为《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 稿件强化可复现性与实验可重复时使用。覆盖电子/信息/信号处理/通信类工作的实验环境记录、随机性控制、数据与预处理透明、算法伪代码与超参数完整披露、硬件与仿真工具链版本、统计显著性与多次运行、以及在中文学报正文与附录里如何组织可复现信息。帮助作者用可复现性作为通过《电子学报》外审、抵御"结果无法重复"质疑的核心竞争力，而非事后补救。
当你为《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 判断选题是否对口、定位到合适栏目/学科方向时使用。覆盖本刊电子科学与技术、信息与通信工程、信号与信息处理、电路与系统、电磁场与微波、集成电路等学科侧重，如何评估选题的创新性与本刊契合度、区别于计算机类与控制类兄弟刊、判断投中文《电子学报》还是英文姊妹刊 Chinese Journal of Electronics、以及原创论文与综述的定位差异。帮助作者在动笔前就把选题放进《电子学报》的正确坐标，避免因不对口在初审被退。
当你按《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 规范打磨中文科技论文写作时使用。覆盖中英文题名、结构式中文摘要与英文 Abstract、中英文关键词、中图分类号(TN 大类)、量和单位与法定计量、公式与变量排版、图表规范、GB/T 7714 顺序编码制参考文献中英文著录、以及电子/信息/信号处理领域术语与数学表达的一致性。帮助作者写出符合《电子学报》体例、语言严谨、可被外审专家顺畅评阅的中文旗舰学报稿件，避免因写作不规范在初审或外审被扣分。
Use when articulating why an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) result matters — its relevance for farm design, management, decision support, or policy. AgSy values systems analysis that informs a decision, so this is what separates an AgSy paper from a methods demo. It frames implications honestly within the model's scope; it does not over-claim or invent impact.
Use when positioning an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript against the literature so it reads as a systems contribution. AgSy readers span agronomy, modelling, livestock, economics, environment, and food-system science, so the paper must engage the systems and modelling literatures they expect — not only one subfield. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the lit review.
Use when writing the response to an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) revision decision. AgSy review is single anonymized with at least two expert systems reviewers and an editor decision, and revisions often turn on model evaluation, sensitivity/uncertainty, and trade-off framing. The response must convert each reviewer without alienating the editor. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
Use when framing the system and describing the model for an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript — defining system boundaries, components, hierarchical levels, and feedbacks, then choosing, describing, and calibrating the model (process/simulation, whole-farm, bio-economic, agent-based, or integrated assessment). This is the distinctive core of an AgSy paper. Structures the model and system; it does not run code for you.
Use when drafting or polishing an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript so it reads clearly for a systems-science audience, follows the journal's format, and meets front-matter requirements (abstract <= 250 words, Highlights, graphical abstract). Research papers run to about 8,000 words (no hard cap). Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.
Use when turning archival findings into a sustained historical argument for The American Historical Review (AHR). The AHR rewards a clear thesis that earns its claims from evidence while remaining alert to contingency and complexity. Builds the argument and its stakes; it does not gather new sources or fabricate evidence.
Use when positioning an American Historical Review (AHR) manuscript within the historiography so it reads as an intervention, not a report. AHR readers are historians across fields who expect you to engage the relevant scholarship and say precisely what you change. Stakes the contribution against prior work; it does not write the literature survey.