Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
Use when targeting 《上海经济研究》(Shanghai Journal of Economics — 上海社会科学院经济研究所主办的经济学月刊, 1982 年创刊, CSSCI) or deciding whether a Chinese econ manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, abstract/keyword house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when targeting 《社会学研究》(Sociological Studies) — the CASS flagship sociology journal. Apply to social stratification, family, networks, urban/rural, work, and institutions, supporting both quantitative survey analysis (CGSS/CFPS/CLDS) and qualitative ethnography. Emphasizes dialogue with sociological theory over econometric policy evaluation; reframes economics-style papers toward a sociological problematic.
Use to write the abstract and keywords for 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) per the journal's norms — Chinese abstract ≤ 200 characters, 3–5 Chinese keywords, English abstract ≤ 150 words, leading with the sociological problematic and the mechanism/concept rather than background. Facts from resources/journal-profile.md.
Use to judge whether a manuscript fits 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) — distinguishing a genuine sociological problematic from an economics-style policy-evaluation paper, and re-routing the latter to economics or cross-disciplinary journals. Use first, before drafting, when discipline fit is uncertain.
Use to translate coefficients or fieldwork materials into a social process for 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) — specifying who, via what mechanism, under what structural conditions, forms what social outcome or structure. Use when results stop at significance or at a vivid story without an explicit mechanism.
Use for the qualitative path in 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) — fieldwork ethnography, in-depth interviews, the extended case method, or grounded theory. Ensures material richness, coding transparency, reflexivity, and trustworthiness, and pushes from story-retelling toward concept building. Use when the draft is a narrative without analytic traction.
Use when writing the response to a Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ) revise-and-resubmit. SPQ reviewers come from different sociological-social-psychology traditions and may pull in different directions, so the response must convert each reviewer without alienating the editor while protecting the structure–individual contribution. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
Use when deciding whether a project fits Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ) and whether to target an Article or a Note. SPQ is the leading journal of sociological social psychology, so the test is whether the work illuminates the link between social structure and the individual — not whether it is a clever psychology finding or a macro-sociology result. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.
Use as the entry point for any Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ) manuscript. Routes to the right SPQ sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and which sociological-social-psychology tradition (symbolic interaction, social structure and personality, group processes, status/affect, identity) and article type (Article vs. Note) fit. It dispatches; it does not draft content.
Use when handling empirical evidence in a 《中国社会科学》 (Social Sciences in China) manuscript — choosing among quantitative, qualitative, and historical-comparative methods so the method serves the proposition, and translating any analysis (including regressions) into a thesis-level finding rather than a coefficient dump. Use when evidence feels disconnected from the argument or reads as method-flexing.