Browse reusable Agent Skills, each with a clear purpose and practical guidance.
Use when targeting 《经济学家》(Economist — 西南财经大学/四川社科学术基金会主办的理论经济学月刊, 1989 年创刊, CSSCI) or deciding whether a Chinese econ/policy manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, abstract house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when targeting 《外国经济与管理》(Foreign Economics and Management — 上海财经大学主办的管理学月刊, 1979 创刊, 双盲匿名审稿, 不收费) or deciding whether a Chinese management manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, double-blind house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when targeting 《工程管理科技前沿》(Frontiers of Engineering Management Science and Technology — 合肥工业大学主办、教育部主管的管理类双月刊, 由《预测》于 2022 年更名, 1982 年创刊, 国自然管理科学 A 级, 双盲匿名审稿) or deciding whether a Chinese engineering-management/forecasting manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, blind-review house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when targeting 《治理研究》(Governance Studies — 中共浙江省委党校/浙江行政学院主办, 2018 年由《中共浙江省委党校学报》更名, 不收版面费/审稿费) or deciding whether a Chinese governance/public-policy manuscript fits this journal. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, abstract house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when targeting Human Resource Management (HRM, Wiley) or deciding whether a strategic HRM / employment-relationship manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when targeting IMF Economic Review or deciding whether an international macro / finance manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Use when drafting or polishing an International Organization (IO) manuscript so it reads for international-relations scholars across paradigms, fits the word caps (Research Article <= 14,000; Research Note <= 8,000; Essay <= 10,000, including tables, figures, and notes but excluding the bibliography), and meets IO format conventions (double-blind, third-person self-citation, short author-date footnotes, separate abstract/word-count/acknowledgments). Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.
Use when building the central argument of a Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JAAR) article. JAAR explicitly wants an essay that "has a point" — analysis with a contestable thesis, not description or survey. Structures the argument; it does not gather the sources.
Use when revising a Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JAAR) article after a revise-and-resubmit and writing the response to readers' reports. Reviewers come from different traditions and methods, so the response must satisfy each on its own terms while protecting the article's argument and its broad significance. Plans the revision and response; it does not fabricate sources.
Use when positioning a Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JAAR) article in the scholarly conversation so it reads as a contribution to the study of religion broadly, not a footnote to one subfield. Stakes the intervention across traditions and methods; it does not write the literature review.